Great Hatred, Little Room: a look deep inside The Process…

MORE extracts from the new book by Tony Blair’s former chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, are now online at the Guardian. While many of today’s headlines will concentrate on Blair’s early desire to talk directly with the IRA’s Army Council, there are other interesting nuggets. Remember when Gerry Adams favourite used to be ‘alternative’? He was, we understood, talking about an alternative to physical force to achieve a united Ireland. But in his first Downing Street meeting with SF, the PM clearly interprets that the ‘alternative’ is Adams being prepared to accept something less than a united Ireland. Powell discusses the book here and introduces it here.
Powell writes:

He [Blair] asked if Adams could go back and tell his people there was no possibility of a united Ireland. Adams said the question was rather how he could bring his people along. He had to show them there was an alternative way forward.

After the meeting Tony said to John [Holmes, Blair’s Northern Ireland adviser] and me he was pleased that Adams seemed to accept he would have to live with something less than a united Ireland as the outcome of the process.

So was the means or the end the real ‘alternative’? I fear there is no answer, since both Blair and Adams preferred the grey shades of ‘constructive ambiguity’ to overcome obstacles in a process they saw as unstoppable.

Both sides come out of the No. 10 encounter agreeing that they should attempt to deliver the republican movement as a whole. Sinn Fein would try to avoid a split; the British would abandon ‘divide and conquer’ tactics – something that would later lead to accusations of being too soft on SF as the two opposing agendas slowly dove-tailed. As the Guardian’s leader column states:

Reading the book, it is hard not to ask whether at times the government became too keen to keep Gerry Adams and Mr McGuinness onboard: the endless and costly Bloody Sunday inquiry and the abortive effort to offer an amnesty to on-the-run prisoners were consequences. The book suggests that even Sinn Féin was surprised to be offered some of this. Peter Mandelson, Mr Powell makes clear, favoured a different approach.

But Powell believed it was right to make concessions to Sinn Féin: “We certainly believed there was every chance that the IRA might go back to violence, just as they had with the Canary Wharf bomb [in 1996].”

Powell adds in the audio file: “We didn’t know quite how to judge what their bottom line was. So instead of aiming for the lowest possible price for the agreement we had to weigh up the significance of getting an agreement and making it last.”

From outside the Derry safehouse, or wherever Powell met SF, it appeared that those with the potential to derail the process could probably make the British buckle under the threat of violence.

The concessions and ceasefire obviously suited both sides well, but – as the subject matter of the extracts so far suggests – the other parties are bit players. However, Powell found that making concessions to SF in practice meant making concessions to unionists, and this ‘see-saw’ balancing act was damaging.

He says: “In the end that led to a loss of credibility in the Agreement and indeed in us, particularly amongst the unionist population. And we probably should not have done that. But at the time on balance that seemed to be necessary to keep that bicycle upright [the process continuing].”

  • Frustrated Democrat

    I know the GFA caused some sleepless nights but after 11 years?

    I think so far all we have is confirmation that Blair let Trimble down after all his promises and swung towards a Green Agenda during the phase of partial decomissioning which allowed the DUP to step in and take the upper hand.

    Maybe by that stage Blair wanted the DUP and SF at the table and not the centre parties as he knew their weaknesses and thought he could deal with them. If correct he read the situation very well.

  • What armed conflict

    Well the revelations in this book say what many of us thought, ( The IRA were owned ) Tony Blair writing IRA Army Council statements, and Jonathan Powell drafting Sinn Fein statements, what next ?

  • Ulsters my homeland

    British/IRA collusion?

  • TAFKABO

    Jonathan Powell drafting Sinn Fein statements ?

    Ourselves Alone, my arse…

    How humbling for the great bearded bore Brownie.
    D’ya think Ian tells Martin what to say as well?

  • jadedobserver

    We have to beware how this could be used by anti-peace process elements. LOL.

  • What armed conflict

    If they ignore this, it will go away!, or will the British Government & Sinn Fein issue a joint statement saying that Jonathon Powell is an attention seeker & Walter Mitty, looking for more book sales ?

  • So, anyway, there they were, Tony Blair and Tom Slab Murphy playing darts in the El Paso.

    Tony to Slab;
    “Slab are you ready to comitt to the peace process?”

    Slab:
    “You signed that Tax exemption certificate?”

    Tony: “Yeah, John Scarlet has it for safe keeping”

    Jonathon Powell: “No Tony I’ve got it here, Slab, time for a trip to the Gents !!”

    Slab: “Tony, I thought it was the Army council who were meant to wear masks”

    Alisdair Cambell, scorer: “Double Top to win !!”

    More to come in June at the high court.

  • Ulsters my homeland

    Downing Street must have the IRA/Shinners by the balls and all this time the shinners have claimed victory.

  • Steve

    This lends pretty strong credence to Adams assertion that he was never in the IRA

  • What armed conflict

    This lends pretty strong credence to Adams assertion that he was never in the IRA

    Posted by Steve on Mar 17, 2008 @ 05:45 PM

    Would that mean that he was an agent of the state ?

  • Prince Eoghan

    The British conducted peace negotiations with SF and used them as conduits to negotiate with the IRA. This is not news for you intellectuals is it? Or is it still sore just how unimportant Unionism was and still is in the whole equation?

  • baslamak
  • TAFKABO

    Yeah Prince,you are of course correct, I’m just sore because the British government didn’t take the leaders of Unionism by the hand, draft statements and instruct my political leaders to release those statements to the media.

    How do you say “self determination” in Irish?

    *snigger*