On that missing thread…

Baldegal wonders why a particular thread was pulled on Slugger a few weeks back. Answer: some of the material being brought up might have had legal complications, and so I suspended the thread. For further detail, check out Slugger’s commenting policy.

  • Frank Sinistra

    Strangely familiar the style of that journal. Maybe it’s was the ‘ding-ding’ entry and the spoof spy stuff, I just can’t work it out.

  • joeCanuck

    That doesn’t happen very often Mick, which is a good thing
    Must be a hard call to make sometimes.
    You and the moderators do a great job in keeping this site reasonably civil, most of the time.
    Long live Slugger.

  • Left hand Luke

    As it turns out, trading standards ( N. I. ) know nothing about this complaint, it looks like the Times informant may have got it wrong. ( should always check your story )

  • Mick Fealty

    Interesting. From what I understand, the story was based on a scanned copy of said letter. But it is certainly worth checking out what you say. As I said before, you couldn’t make it up, or could you?

  • Left hand Luke.

    Trading Standards Press Office: 02890529263.

  • Sean

    lawyers sure have the grand and glorious english people running scared

  • Left hand luke

    It looks like the Times informant is a walt.

  • Simon t

    Interesting. From what I understand, the story was based on a scanned copy of said letter. But it is certainly worth checking out what you say. As I said before, you couldn’t make it up, or could you?
    Mick Fealty.

    Well Mick, Did You ?