“the best small country in the world”

In the Financial Times [subs req] economist, and Scot, John Kay, identifies belligerent self-congratulation as a common Scottish characteristic – although it could probably be evidenced wider afield – and whilst recognising the benefits of the Union in the two centuries following 1707 argues that “its effects in the subsequent 100 years is more uncertain.” It’s part one of a two-part argument. Although the FT article is subscription bound [adds actually it’s also available here], John Kay has his own website and reprints the article thereIn an echo of some of the recent arguments citing the necessity of an “indigenous” deal here, he also picks up on the link between Scotland’s relative economic decline and “the appeal of separatism”.

Still, the main responsibility for Scots’ relative economic failure lies with Scots themselves. Belligerent self-congratulation is ill-suited to a changing economic environment and Scottish corporate responses to new technology and new competition were defensive and inept. Locomotive and ship builders responded by consolidating under weak leadership. Trade unions quarrelled not just with management but with each other for a larger share of a diminishing cake. The Distillers Company amalgamated independent whisky producers into one business whose decades of complacent mismanagement ended only when the company was acquired by Guinness.

The appeal of separatism in modern Scotland is linked to the country’s relative economic decline, as self- congratulation turns to grievance in response to failure. The crucial issue for Scotland’s future is whether independence would reduce that sentiment, or aggravate it.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.