More corrupt than last year?

BackSeatDriver Dick O’Brien taunts [some] of his co-bloggers with Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2005. But, as I noted this time last year [has it really been that long? – Ed] Ireland was rated as 17th least corrupt at 7.5 in 2004. A year later the perception is that Ireland has become slightly more corrupt – now 19th with a rating of 7.4, and as equally corrupt as Belgium, more corrupt than the US or the UK or France, and only slightly less corrupt than Chile. Take a bow, Iceland!.. just beating last year’s least corrupt country, Finland.

Here’s the list of the 30 least corrupt countries on the Index, and the full results [pdf file]

Figures indicate – Rank, Country, 2005 CPI score

1 Iceland 9.7

2 Finland 9.6
New Zealand 9.6

4 Denmark 9.5

5 Singapore 9.4

6 Sweden 9.2

7 Switzerland 9.1

8 Norway 8.9

9 Australia 8.8

10 Austria 8.7

11 Netherlands 8.6
United Kingdom 8.6

13 Luxembourg 8.5

14 Canada 8.4

15 Hong Kong 8.3

16 Germany 8.2

17 USA 7.6

18 France 7.5

19 Belgium 7.4
Ireland 7.4

21 Chile 7.3
Japan 7.3

23 Spain 7.0

24 Barbados 6.9

25 Malta 6.6

26 Portugal 6.5

27 Estonia 6.4

28 Israel 6.3
Oman 6.3

30 United Arab Emirates 6.2

Update The BBC report on the Corruption Index… and the RTÉ report are both worth noting.

As the RTÉ report points out –

Ten years ago Ireland was deemed the 11th least corrupt country with a score of 8.57.

Transparency International, which compiles the rankings from among 159 countries, says the Irish ranking is relatively high in international terms, but falls well short of the scores allocated to its northern European neighbours. Iceland is perceived to be the ‘least corrupt country’ with a score of 9.7 and is closely followed by Finland on 9.6 out of 10. The UK also scores highly with 8.6 out of 10.

According to John Devitt, acting CEO of Transparency International Ireland, the ‘sobering’ decline in Ireland’s international standing should provide the impetus for reform.

Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated. 

4 thoughts on “More corrupt than last year?”

  1. “just beating last year’s least corrupt country, Finland”

    It’s only a coincidence that I moved here a year ago. I swear.

  2. This is only a perception index remember. The people down here may well consider our politicians to be corrupt, but most of the evidence related to this comes out in the various tribunals into planning-corruption and payments to politicians and as such nearly all the allegations relate to the Haughey era (before 1992). In that context, I don’t think it is fair to label present-day politicians/Government as being in the same league as them.

  3. BB,

    Remember who handled those checks without looking at them–who was minister of finance during a fair size of the Haughey era

Comments are closed.