US admission provides some transparency.. at last

The general media here hasn’t, yet, examined the implications of the US administration, in the person of Mitchell Reiss, admitting ownership of the compromise on photographic evidence of decommissioning, as contained in the ‘deal that never was’. But it does have an impact on who exactly should have been seen, and been reported, as being under pressure as that last deadline approached.. and passed.. and who has been saying ‘No’. Think of it this way.. which of the two separate phone-calls made by the US President do you think was reported more accurately at the time – The one to Ian Paisley?.. or the one to Gerry Adams?