Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

Profile for SK

This user has not yet written a description

Latest comments from SK (see all)

SK has commented 298 times (12 in the last month).

  1. Comment on Normality and rugby
    on 19 May 2012 at 11:39 pm

    “Well done to all British clubs :Hearts and Chelsea won, and Ulster were beaten, 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.”

    _____

    Oh dear. Sit down Ulsterman.

    Go to comment

  2. Comment on Unemployment in Ireland: a tale of two countries…
    on 16 May 2012 at 10:32 am

    Northern Ireland is insulated from the real world by a UK government seeking to keep the place as pacified as possible until society there becomes (relatively) normal. That molly-coddling will not last forever.

    Incidentally, Northern Ireland is not a country.

    Go to comment

  3. Comment on “are you serious?” – redux
    on 8 May 2012 at 7:34 pm

    ” They feel self-conscious and tend to deliberately make a point of never saying the difficult word combination of “Northern Ireland” and only use easier sounds such as “North””

    _________

    Fork handles,

    This might blow your mind, but many people describe NI as the “the north” in common parlance simply because it’s less cumbersome than the official name. A lot of unionists describe the ROI as “the south” in normal conversation for precisely the same reason. Mental eh? Lock them up.

    Incidentally, the sickness you describe above must be some variant of the one that prevents so many people who were born, bread and buttered on an island called Ireland from referring to themselves as “Irish”. Oh the horror of that word. “Irish”. There I said it again.

    Go to comment

  4. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 4 May 2012 at 3:27 pm

    ” the “conflict” consisted mainly of Republicans attacking and killing a load of people; Loyalists attacking and killing a smaller number of people back.. ”
    ________________

    Offensive, mealy-mouthed, bollocks.

    Take a gander at CAIN and note that the first civilian to die was at the hands of Loyalists, the first cop to die was murdered by Loyalists and the first bombing was committed by Loyalists (masquerading as Republicans).

    But sure the Loyalists weren’t the aggressors, they were only killing a smaller number of people back.

    Go to comment

  5. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 6:02 pm

    “Never mind all that lark about reasonable force and acting within the law. We might as well do away with inquests and give the security forces a free hand to murder at will anyone who they believe is a threat.”

    There is a difference between a guy running for a train and two lads in jumpsuits waving kalashnikovs around.

    Go to comment

  6. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 6:00 pm

    What are you talking about “sidestep”? When I said “anybody”, what did you think I meant?

    Had the IRA got the upper hand in that firefight, what would they have done to the wounded soldiers? Killed them stone dead.

    I’m a nationalist, but the whole “live by the sword, die by the sword” thing absolutely applies in scenarios such as this one as far as I’m concerned.

    Go to comment

  7. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 5:50 pm

    “And if the British Army reserve the right to shoot unarmed people, then they have no right to complain about getting shot at themselves?”

    If anybody claims the right to shoot at an unarmed individual, then they forfeit the right to scream about human rights when it happens to them. In my opnion.

    Go to comment

  8. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 5:45 pm

    “Seriously, what are you talking about?”

    ______

    If the Ra reserves the right to shoot unarmed people, then they have no right to complain about getting shot at themselves.

    Is that an unreasonable statement?

    Go to comment

  9. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 5:32 pm

    “So if the IRA kill a few soldiers that’s fine too?”

    I’m not saying it’s fine. No aspect of the troubles was fine.

    Go to comment

  10. Comment on “Given these circumstances we believe the soldiers used reasonable force.”
    on 3 May 2012 at 5:27 pm

    “I think the republican line is farctionally more subtle (though no less flawed). From what is frequently stated here and elsewhere republicans claim that since the security forces claimed moral superiority over the IRA, then they (the security forces) had to abide by higher standards.”

    _____

    Conversely, the IRA themselves claimed moral superiority over the British Army by virtue of the fact that their cause was a just one. Why, then, didn’t they themselves feel obligated to conduct themselves in a manner befitting of the “good guys”?

    “Those Brits think they’re better than us, so we’re allowed to behave worse than them”. It’s just so convoluted.

    When it comes to the troubles, I would dispute the notion that the words “British” and “morally superior” belong in the same sentence. But at least the Crown Forces never came come out of a firefight screaming about their human rights.

    Go to comment

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
15 queries. 0.280 seconds.