a. What does this have to do with him being a millionaire? Just because he is personally wealthy doesn’t mean he should be profligate with other people’s money.
b. The ‘return on investment’ is laughable. It assumes that if there was no public money, there would be zero private sector investment. In any case the £22 million isn’t just given to us, people have to do something in return, there is only a marginal benefit.
Is the best way to overcome the legacy of conflict simply to forget about it? Author and journalist David Rieff spoke on this subject last week in a seminar at the Institute for International Integration Studies (IIIS) at Trinity College Dublin. Rieff has recently written a book titled, Against Remembrance (published in Ireland by Liffey [...] read our review »
This reads as if a mad picaresque tale. Myers as first a reporter for RTÉ and then as a freelance journalist with no real experience, finds himself wandering into savagery as he hastens north as the Troubles explode. A soldier dies next to him; he witnesses an IRA ambush; he sees children shot to death [...] read our review »
This was a book that I first reviewed at the same time as “Unionism Decayed” back in 2008. Like Vance’s work, it is the author’s portrayal of a defeated political movement or ideal and as a Unionist it was instructional to read an interpretation of the immediate post-Agreement period from the other side of the fence. [...] read our review »
Comment on Millionaire Minister hangs art
on 29 July 2010 at 12:06 pm
a. What does this have to do with him being a millionaire? Just because he is personally wealthy doesn’t mean he should be profligate with other people’s money.
b. The ‘return on investment’ is laughable. It assumes that if there was no public money, there would be zero private sector investment. In any case the £22 million isn’t just given to us, people have to do something in return, there is only a marginal benefit.
Go to comment