Slugger O'Toole

This user has not yet written a description

Latest posts from oracle (see all)

oracle has posted 1 times (0 in the last month).

Latest comments from oracle (see all)

oracle has commented 348 times (0 in the last month).

1. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 9 September 2011 at 7:00 pm

   Mick with respect the onus is not on me to falsify at all…. Why would you possibly state that!

   Raven stated that “he was an associate member too but that didn’t make him an expert” at no point did Raven state that David Percy was wrong and why he was wrong.
   If Percy’s analysis of the NASA still photographs or official video is wrong surely someone should point out where.
   That would be a first as NASA will not discuss different light sources in the photographs, at no stage have NASA claimed that any of the queried photographs are falsified by the doubters such as Percy.
   If Raven has heard of Percy he must have watched a video of Percy disputing the photographic evidence yet as a keen photographer (otherwise why would he be an associate of the RPS) he didn’t refute what Percy claims.

   I’m a amateur photographer myself I couldn’t go anywhere near court as an expert witness but I could find my way round fool argument that a single light source can cast shadows in different directions, it can’t it is an impossibility, we would have to rip up all the laws of physics!

   Raven,

   I’m searching thoroughly for a hard copy report that I have in my possession somewhere however when you move home 5 times in 7 years it’s a paper chase.
   If that report does not refer to a RPS study I’ll hold my hand up to an error (i’m not frightened to make genuine mistakes) but give me a bit of time.
   I’ve a contract to finish by Tuesday and I’m well behind and I’ve a 990 pages of reports to read to respond to Pete.

   Pete

   I’ll respond to you but I’m halfway through one report of 150 pages and another to go through at 840 pages long with your wish list of quotes and sources but it’ll have to wait until after Tuesday.

   Go to comment

2. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 8 September 2011 at 12:34 pm

   Or read what Richard Feyman had to say during the 1986 Rogers commission on the investigation into the Challenger disaster

   here’s his wiki link…. another looney eh?

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman

   Go to comment

3. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 8 September 2011 at 12:23 pm

   Have any of you people even bothered to read the report by

   The review of United States human space plans committee

   Everybody on the committee work for NASA or the N.S.A or the U.S.A.F from scientists to shuttle pilots the chair of the committee was Sally Ride PHd in physics Shuttle astronaut here is her Wiki entry (tell me are they looneys, mad, or just drug crazed)

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Ride

   the bottom line in the report written in 1987 guys 1987 think about that date…. That if …. IF…the US spent 3-9 billion dollars a year every year they might be able to go to the moon in … wait for it are you sitting down 2014-2017

   Go to comment

4. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 7 September 2011 at 12:13 pm

   Pete,

   I didn’t realise you were a supporter of violence!

   But your clip is a shortened version of the event, it was assault but it’s not as if Bart Sibrel didn’t deserve it for calling him a coward… liar yes but coward no.

   Sibrel has asked all the Astranauts to swear on the bible that they landed on the Moon… not a deal breaker for any other human being on the planet.
   If I asked Seb Coe to swear on the bible that he won a gold medal I don’t think he’d refuse, or Bill Gates if I asked him was he rich I don’t think he’d refuse or if I asked a round the world sailor or mountain climber to swear to their achievements I couldn’t see anyone objecting.

   Yet Sibrel went through 13 astronauts with the same straight forward task… each and every one of them refused the first to accept his challenge was an atheist!
   Why would Sibrel make a spectacle of himself in asking this, well the answer is simple Sibrel is strongly rumored to be holding to taped interviews/confessions similar to the Boston college stuff, not to be released until after death!

   Go to comment

5. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 7 September 2011 at 11:51 am

   BTW…

   I love Petes posts on science and I love the scientific work that NASA does the reality is that 99.99% of their work has nothing to do with the misinformation that was peddled to the uninformed masses decades ago.

   But there’s more than enough information out there for even the feeblest of minds to ask questions, the “Lunar landing” are rather similar to our “Peace Process” the further you stand back from them and examine them the clearer to recognize them as just a pile of fantasy nonsense for the masses.

   Go to comment

6. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 7 September 2011 at 11:40 am

   JR,

   You saw what on the BBC exactly….. A few black and white shots from 25 kilometers which has no exact detail???
   Yet you automatically accept this as proof! Jesus any prosecutor would just love to have you on a jury panel their record would be 100% without any evidence worth a damn.

   The Royal Photographic Society did an in-depth study of all the NASA footage from all the Apollo missions and concluded that every single still photograph was an utter fake and that the NASA videos were not shot at 1/6th gravity, so if all the scientists are not wrong about the moons gravity where were they filmed?

   The man who designed the chest cameras used by the astronauts and the company specialists who manufactured them agree 100% THAT IT WAS NOT THEIR CAMERA THAT TOOK THE PHOTOS that everyone associates with the Apollo missions and the lunar landings, yet they were the only cameras taken on the mission and released to the public before the astronauts were released from quarantine!

   So ask yourself this if the photos were released while the astranauts were in quarantine and it wasn’t the cameras used on the mission that took them and the RSP has already declared the photos a fake it means one thing.
   The photos were faked before the Apollo 11 left the Cape, why would you fake photos before you left unless you weren’t going at all.

   I could go on with reams of blunders in the photos alone and the questions that NASA refuse to answer even after 40 years of asking but hell that would ruin the fun for people finding out for themselves.

   Go to comment

7. Comment on “We can retrace the astronauts’ steps with greater clarity”
   on 6 September 2011 at 11:13 pm

   If you even remotely fantasize that the astronauts of the USA walked on the moon in the years 1969-1972 you are obscenely stupid.
   Perhaps it’s the rank weakness that runs through every fibre in your bodies that you’re willing to ignore reality for the sake of a piece of escapism and fairytales.

   At that period in time it was a physical and technological impossibility…….. End of!

   Go to comment

8. Comment on Sinn Féin’s Ard Fheis this weekend in Belfast #ardfheis … kicking off party conference season
   on 6 September 2011 at 10:36 am

   Are Coco-Cola sponsoring the event this year or is it still rich landlords

   Go to comment

9. Comment on POTD – Caption comp
   on 6 September 2011 at 9:52 am

   Banks pay protection money to urban guerrillas

   Go to comment

10. Comment on “The OPONI senior management is at present dysfunctional, there is a serious lack of trust between many senior staff”
    on 5 September 2011 at 7:41 pm

    Mick,

    That’s a pretty strange thing to post; you’re attempting to exonerate an unmitigated failure with suggestion of difficulty.
    The only criteria required to do that job correctly is honesty and independence perhaps you could enlighten us all on which one of those particular traits the ombudsman was lacking!

    Nula O’Loan didn’t find it beyond her, indeed she’d have found it even easier if the old elements of the RUC hadn’t attempted to deliberately thwart or stall her investigations at every opportunity.

    His staff rebelled because investigations deemed embarrassing to the state were not afforded the forensic examination required and thus senior members of staff felt that reflected on them and their professionalism.

    Hutchinson is an intelligent man he was fully aware what was happening he has made the position of ombudsman appear partisan and therefore his position automatically becomes untenable.
    He should not be afforded the luxury of resigning at his leisure instead he should be sacked with immediate effect.

    I’m surprised with you attitude that you adopted on this topic Mick, if someone was going to your house looking for a fool they’d need to bring one with them, which only makes your post all the more bizarre.

    Go to comment