Thursday, February 21, 2008
“now it’s run from a prefabricated extension to the house..”
The BBC’s Mark Devenport was, apparently, talking to UUP MLA Billy Armstrong about his prefabricated constituency office “owned by his wife and based on their farm”, for which he had been claiming rental costs from public funds, but Mark doesn’t appear to have seen the Belfast Telegraph beforehand. According to a report there, and in contrast to the previous descripton given here - that “the prefabricated constituency office was “purpose built” and is located on lawns close to his home” - Mr Armstrong now claims that the office was “an extension to his home and he does not consider that planning permission is required.”
A DoE Planning Service spokeswoman said: “The Divisional Planning Office has no record of planning permission being granted for a constituency office or an associated sign at this location. Enforcement action is not under way but the alleged breach will now be investigated by the division.”
The full response to David Gordon’s FoI request on the rent claimed by MLAs is noted here - downloadable as a Word document here.
Details of the landlords of MLA offices have been withheld by Stormont officials. This decision will be challenged, if necessary through a complaint to the Information Commissioner, the watchdog for the FOI Act.
The Assembly argued that revealing the identity of commercial landlord interests could cause them financial difficulties.
Its FOI response said: “Despite the considerable political developments in Northern Ireland in recent times, the potential for economic sanctions towards commercial interests from a differing community background persists.”
Pete Baker @ 08:06 PM
Despite the considerable political developments in Northern Ireland in recent times, the potential for economic sanctions towards commercial interests from a differing community background persists.
I wonder did they make that up, due to personal bias, or is there a report or study that would justify it?
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 08:45 PMWell if you have ABC properties renting out to perhaps those of a Republican persuasion it’s easy to see why a company or firm and its employees may fear a wacky loyalist turning up at perhaps a time of severe loyal order strife, just for example.
On the other hand it could be a case Slab’s Prefabs renting out to the bhoys, which would be interesting.
But, this whole rental fiasco is absolutely mind boggling.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 09:04 PMUTV Live had Poots on. He was asked did he employ a family member - he said yes. They pointed out he wasn’t mentioned on the DUP list.
Another factor is family members of one Rep employed through another, these are currently being hidden (though SF were open about it).
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 09:09 PMWhat sort of idiot have the UUP got in Portacabin Billy,a man who does not know an office from an extension. Here is a man who is supposed to help people with their planning problems but only seems to be helping himself. I wonder how many planning applications has he opposed on the grounds of planning policy? There are alot of people turned down in Mid Ulster for planning permission so my advise to them would be to build away without permission and use the excuse if caught that if its good enough for an MLA,who is supposed to uphold the laws of the land, to build then it must be good enough for them. It is interesting to note that Reggie has still to make a comment
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 09:11 PMI feel a PPS14 rant on the way....
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 09:25 PMCurrently central Belfast top wack for a decent office is cuurent £12 per sq/m. Nearly all are claiming well above that for shitholes in the sticks.
These lot are just involved in a massive accountancy trick and that’s before you factor in the double claims for two MLAs using the same office, the MP claim in many cases and in some cases the EU claim.
Then the double claimed office expenses etc.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 09:38 PMMust be a good way to make a living being an MLA.Not only does Billy pay his wife rent but he also employs her as well as his daughter.Does anyone know their pay? Did he advertise these posts? Does his local association see his accounts? Has his association held a meeting to discuss the issue. So many questions so few answers. Come on Reg lets hear your position after all you wrote to the PM requesting him to look into the whole issue of probity in Stormont. Reg you need to look at your own party and clean it up by showing leadership and sacking Billy but the again I am told that his daughter,who is married to a local pig farmer,(so thats 2 of them bringing home the bacon)is his replacement.Talk about keeping it in the family.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:02 PMSurely the answer to all of this is to have all those working for an MLA/ MP employed by the Assembly/ Westminster on a common set of terms and conditions. The MLA/ MP could still decide who to employ but at least there would be an openess currently lacking. Similarly an individual MLA/ MP should not rent an office that should be centralised so any contract is between the landlord and relevant legislature.
Perhaps if we paid these people properly there wouldn’t be the temptation to sink the arm on the expenses front. Give them their £52K but only if they reduce the number of MLAs to something like 72 and reform the office costs allowances.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:14 PMAnd thus to continue on from Mark’s supposition you could force an argument thus that the electoral contract between constituent and representative to work policy in line with ideology becomes tainted by pursuit of personal financial gain in doing so. This obviously isn’t a part of any representative contract that is based on a wider franchise of taking up issues on behalf of constituents.
You would think that MLAs would take all is required to fulfil this democratic process and therefore not filter excessive public funds via false rental claims as part of working this democracy.
As it appears Billy may well have broken two here: planning obligations imposed on his perhaps erstwhile constituents, and family embezzlement, which is becoming a wider concern now.
While, as an excuse goes, the rules are ropey the operation of market forces and public regulations in which constituents operate in should be an appropriate indicator not to therefore finance personal property from public funds.
Ultimately if Joe Public uses salaried pay to cover such expenses surely MLAs would be expected to do the same or should we follow our MLAs example and perhaps, as it would seem, falsify records, which in other lines of work would amount to dismissal.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:18 PMHave just been told that Billy’s bungalow may not be cosher with the planners.I have been informed that the Bay window in his house is to big. Maybe its an extension!!!
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:38 PMI certainly do not go along with the thinking that “maybe if we paid them more they wouldn’t need to fiddle”. The poor dears - forced by economic deprivation to commit dishonesties quite out of character with their usual high standards of moral rectitude.
As if! If we paid the buggers more they would just feel the need to fiddle more commensurate with the hike in salary.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:48 PMWhat this tells you is that some of our elected representatives are exceedingly greedy and exceedingly stupid. This really is utterly pathetic.
Some aren’t satisfied with over claiming but instead like to double claim, and some think Planning is meant for everyone else. All MLA’s involved in what I would regard as fraud should resign immediately their continuance in office besmirches the reputation of all elected representatives. It is an utter disgrace and there really is no excuse for it. Wait to we get into some MLA’s and close contacts with developers, more fun down the road.
I actually think we would be better off with more MLA’s pay them less and tighten up on expenses. Encourage part time representatives who have other interests and expertise. Sometimes I think what is wrong with career politicians is that they don’t exist in the real world.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 10:49 PMCrataegus
like New Hampshire?
I agree that some link between representatives and the real work is important. I also agree that part-time and term limited citizen legislators sound attractive but in a NI context you would fill Stormont with dole hounds and barristers.
We have created a professional class of politicians so let’s pay them a professional wage and remove the ability to cheat the expenses.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:17 PMBTW dodgy portacabins aside who on earth thought Armstrong was suitable to sit in any legislature?
I’m not just picking on Billy but out of the 108 (108!) how many are up to it?
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:19 PMCan we have a new thread on tonight’s LETS TALK? I thought it was appalling.
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:26 PMBilly’s office in Magherafelt was situated in an obscure back street building. It was staffed and run by Cllr Georgre Shiels of Magherafelt Council. Maybe this was the reason for its demise!
When the same GS became chairman of the UUP constituency assoc it too went down to 25% of what it was when he first took over! At least there is consistency!
And was the UUP not also centre stage in an embarassing milaege claim enquiry at Magherafelt Council?
When will both unionist parties stop treating their voters as meal tickets for MLAs and their extended families. Paisley Snr. is now practically impotent in this regard but surely Empey could still shift himself and act locally rather than writing cosy letters to a bunch of spacers over in England!?Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:30 PMLet’s Talk is discussing the employment of relatives by MLA’s and there doesn’t seem to be as much anxiety as evidenced here on Slugger. All the parties seem to do it – the DUP and SF do it.
One of the reasons they say is MLA’s need to trust their employees.
Just how leaky would the SF and DUP ships be if they employed others?!
Let them employ relatives if they want – Lord knows you’d need to love ‘em not to laugh at some of the crap they come out with.
Politics IS different, the characteristics it requires are many but an unpunctured ego is probably one of them. It is also different ‘cos the public can sack them – but until very recently – whether politicians talked crap or were up to no good won them votes.
The electorate have got the politicians they deserve. Come 2011 will any of this matter?
By 2011 Gregory will have paid his wife 5 years rent, pocket the profits and then sell the property with a large capital gains benefit from you guys. Ditto for the Ian Og extended family. I doubt farmer Billy will be as profitable. There are probably many others – and that’s not counting the salaries kept within the family circle.
It’s easy to see why it matters to MLA’s – but is anyone suggesting Campbell, Dodds or Paisley won’t be returned at the next election? Not a bit of it! Nor will it make a jot of difference that a party’s members cleared up a crime scene murder so that murderers still walk the streets free to pick up their war pensions paid out in crisp Northern Bank notes!
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:36 PMInteresting question from Bonarlaw regarding how many are up to the standard that should be expected for an MLA. Many of these people must think that they have won the lottery and its just a case of finding as many ways as possible to get public money through the front door of their homes. A large proportion of these representives couldn’t hold down a decent job or indeed get one in the real world. Many are retired on generous pensions. I know a few that can barely read and write but their party ticket gets them elected. I have seen a few letters written by one of them and they were laughable with regard to spelling and use of words. Little wonder none of them want to rock any boats up at Stormont. Its a joke to see how many former super prods, especially in the DUP, who have become the sort of people who the Alliance Party could almost welcome with open arms!! Where did all the old rhetoric about Sinn Fein/IRA and all the ranting about Section 75 etc etc etc go?
Posted by on Feb 21, 2008 @ 11:52 PMBonarlaw
but out of the 108 (108!) how many are up to it?
I can think of a lot who definitely aren’t, but for obvious reasons I won’t list them.
Recently I have mentioned to a number of them (that I have the misfortune of being in the company of) some concerns that I have regarding the running of the various departments related to development, the need for co-ordination, priorities and clear objectives. I have mentioned the possibility that some may be acting in a manner that could be challenged in court etc etc. They had not the slightest idea what I was talking about or implying and worse than that had absolutely NO interest. In my experience most MLA’s really don’t care about real issues.
We have created a professional class of politicians so let’s pay them a professional wage and remove the ability to cheat the expenses.
I don’t think the word professional properly describes most of our politicians. Part of the problem is they have spent so long in the introverted complexity of NI politics, and all its self serving jargon that some have lost touch with reality. I am less than happy to pay many of them. The problem is that election here simply return more of the same. There must be a better way to proceed so we get some real expertise and ability.
Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 12:00 AMBonarLaw - I agree, MLA’s should be paid more. Making the job part-time will mean the job just won’t be done properly. What is needed is a much higher calibre of public representative - those who know business, difficulties in communities and industrial sectors - and people who can; listen, assimilate information and explain their positions.
Making it a part-time job for the amateur is the last thing we need – particularly since NI is public sector heavy and many of the people with these skills are expressly prohibited from politics.
Increasing pay isn’t enough – openness and transparency in party politics is also needed. NI doesn’t have the high standards that can reveal (much less regulate) how parties are funded. Nor is there any visibility on how they spend public money given them to enable their roles as public representatives. At the very least the Assembly should not be paying out using standards below those of Westminster – and the Assembly’s reports of MLA expenditure should be as least as detailed as those for the House of Commons.
This too is not enough.
NI has way too many government departments and an insane number of local councils. It causes public confusion – people don’t know what department is responsible for what. Reduce the number of departments to 5 – 6 with justice. Reduce the number of councils to a max of 7 – and don’t split Belfast into a gerrymander of sectarian politics. The city exists and needs organised on that basis.
Doing this reduces the number of Assembly statutory committees by half. Scotland can do it – why can’t we? Once you’ve cut the committees – set up a standing committee that considers public petitions and force the MLA’s to listen and explain.
After this – reduce the number of MLA’s per constituency from 6 to 5 – a total of 90. Then require all elected to resign any local council memberships.
I hate to say this – I’ve just watched the news and find myself in one of those rare occasions when I’m in agreement with Reg! MLA’s should not be required to vote themselves pay increases – it brings their roles in to disrepute – and they don’t need any help in that regard. Set MLA pay to change with the RPI.
Crat – you’re playing to the gallery. What are you suggesting – we drop democracy and put the “experts” in? Didn’t we try that for 30 years?
Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 12:25 AMIs he suggesting that he was paying rent for what he considers to be an extension to his home.It gets worse.He should stop digging.
Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 12:38 AMOne of the reasons they say is MLA’s need to trust their employees.
I guess that rules out giving them chauffeurs then.
Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 12:51 AMBilly not having obtained planning permission will have the spinn off in not being liable for an increase in rates which will open another avenue to be investigated.
After all this lost revenue from rates will have a direct finiancial negative effect to HIS local councils ability to supply essentual services.
Which have to bring his honesty and integrity into question.
Perhaps time to build purpose built offices on council owned land to whom the rent could be paid directly and in turn allow profits back into council funds.Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 01:01 AMDon Quixote
Crat – What are you suggesting – we drop democracy and put the “experts” in? Didn’t we try that for 30 years?
I am truely and utterly unimpressed by the ability of most of our MLA’a. (Some are are very capable.) Keeping the structures as they are is not going to lift the standard.
No we have not had experts running the place for 30 years we have been run by Civil Servants and the unaccountable. We have had government minsters who are here today and gone tomorrow.
There has to be a way of involving people with very real and specific expertise. £52000 is not going to do it. Imagine you run a successful small company are you going to drop that to take up politics for £520000? The public mood is fickle and in 5 years, who knows,and you could be voted out. In the interim what has happened to your business?
Yes the Civil Service are excluded from politics and that is problematic, but the structures you accept exclude most business people. In addition there is an understandable reticence for anyone in business to get involved in politics.
Totally agree with you about the number of Departments etc, really does need to be reduced, and in the past have frequently argued for coherent council areas including a greater Belfast so that services can be properly coordinated.
Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 01:05 AMsorry my last thought on building offices on Council land would be a no goer as well.
As the profits would go back to the control of the same criminals.
I had forgotten, if you ask any county council for a breakdown of your rates bill, they will not give it up as the LAW says they don`t have to.Posted by on Feb 22, 2008 @ 01:09 AM
