Thursday, October 04, 2007
Lottery fund decision “absolute rubbish” - Paisley
Written on headed Commons paper, it denounced the grounds for turning down the grant bid as “absolute rubbish”. It also claimed, more than once, that Mr Sweeney’s visitor centre plans had the support of UNESCO, the UN body which oversees world heritage sites like the Causeway. It said: “ UNESCO saw and approved the plans, and were very impressed by the proposal.”
A claim which UNESCO have already denied. Another possible twist below the fold.
From the Belfast telegraph report
Mr Sweeney has spoken publicly about holding a highly-favourable meeting with senior UNESCO official Mechtild Rossler in 2001.
Ms Rossler has contested any suggestion of endorsement, and would not have had the authority to personally sign the organisation up to the project in any case.
She has made clear to the Belfast Telegraph that she would not support anything without going through the necessary UNESCO procedures.
She has also stated that UNESCO does not “decide on proposals” and that this would be a matter for Government bodies in the light of the UNESCO 2003 report.
Ms Rossler further said: “We were absolutely clear that any new visitor centre must be built in the footprint of the centre that was burnt down. That is my position and I am not moving one millimetre.”
A DUP source told the Belfast Telegraph that Mr Paisley Snr had met with a UNESCO official to discuss the Causeway situation.
Mr Sweeney’s proposals at the 2001 meeting differed in a key respect from those on the table by 2003. His 2001 blueprint was to have been located on Moyle Council’s land above the Causeway.
By 2003 - the time of Mr Paisley’s letter - his proposal was for an alternative location on his own land.
There is, potentially, a link with another recent controversy - which comes via Roger Stanyard in the Slugger comment zone here - and also brings DUP MLA Mervyn Storey back into the frame.
In a lengthy article on the links between DUP members and the young-Earthers the British Centre for Science Education points to the promotion of some of their non-evolutionary beliefs.
In a letter to the Belfast Newsletter [added link] published on 6th June 2006 George Dawson stated: “Over recent months myself and colleagues, David Simpson MP and Mervyn Storey MLA, have been pressing government on the need to ensure that interpretation at the new Causeway interpretative centre is inclusive of the views expressed by Rev Dr Greer and elaborated upon in the article by Dr Tas Walker. This is a matter of equality and tourism opportunity. In equality terms it is incumbent upon government not to discriminate against this equally scientific viewpoint and those who believe it.”
......In the original 3rd June 2006 article Greer claimed that the Causeway was formed 4,500 years ago during Noah’s flood. Greer pushed the pamphlet on the Causeway by Tas Walker of Answers in Genesis. Presumably Greer was angling to get Answers in Genesis material in the Causeway Centre. Greer’s arguments about the age of the Causeway, no doubt entirely lifted from the AiG material are risible. Science strongly suggests it was formed about 60-65 million years ago.
......The stakes for the creationists are very high. The Giant’s Causeway attracts some 500,000 visitors a year and is Northern Ireland’s largest tourist attraction. Both for school children studying geography or geology it is a major element in field studies. Getting creationism into the new Causeway visitor centre, believed to cost around £20 million, will be a huge coup for the creationists. No wonder they are putting so much effort into it. Again, it is exactly the same game being played by fundamentalists in the United States with the Grand Canyon.
A publicly funded Causeway Centre wouldn’t be as free to decide what materials were used in an intrepretive centre.
Pete Baker @ 11:11 AM
Disgraceful carry on by the DUP.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 11:58 AMGood man Pete, stay on their backs.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:06 PMI’m speechless and very annoyed. This calls for something more than a stern letter.
Creationism at the Causeway....
How do we stop this bullshit?Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:07 PMAs you can see from the material in the NALIL September archives the land belongs to Seaport Investments Limited, now Seaport (NI) Ltd. Sweeney is a director. Does this mean that the (unidentified) shareholders own the land? Also check the PACNI link to read about the rejection of the earlier plans for the land in front and west of the Nook.
Dodds and especially Foster are taking a stand on dodgy ground.
PS Click images to enlarge.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:09 PMBy turning the Visitors Centre into a centre of education for creationism opens up the possibility that Finn McCool did actually build it.
You sceptics just have to believe.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:11 PMHey mr paisley your slip is begining to show
Wonder how much more dirt lies swept under the rug waiting to be found
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:11 PMHang on a minute, I just read the final part of that post. Rude not to do it first time, I know..
But seriously, are they for real? I might nip down the School of Geography at Queens this afternoon and see if I can rustle up some academic interest in making a stand against this. I actually cannot believe they’d try to do this. Don’t they see what a laughing stock they continue to make of themselves? Nothing’s really changed from the days of swings chained up in parks in these peoples heads.......
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:13 PMUnionist, Finn has a pub in Bushmills Main Street and a mural in Dodge. It seems he’s a half-pint man. Perhaps he’s a major shareholder in Seaport (NI) Limited - and is infatuated with the Minister of the Environment!!
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:29 PMFrom the BT report:
“A DUP source told the Belfast Telegraph that Mr Paisley Snr had met with a UNESCO official to discuss the Causeway situation.
Mr Sweeney’s proposals at the 2001 meeting differed in a key respect from those on the table by 2003. His 2001 blueprint was to have been located on Moyle Council’s land above the Causeway.
By 2003 - the time of Mr Paisley’s letter - his proposal was for an alternative location on his own land.”
Could this quote from the ‘DUP source’ be the first move by the party to attempt to wriggle out of the hole they’ve got themselves into?
They could be setting up Sweeney as the fall guy here, blaming the whole affair on disingenuity on his part.
The story goes as follows: Sweeney acquired UNESCO backing for a modest proposed centre on the original site and informed certain members of the DUP of this fact. He then slyly switched the plans to another, more profitable but unapproved by UNESCO, site without telling the DUP(ed) who inadvertently continued to lobby for his revised scheme.
Of course, when in a hole one should be careful not to end up digging oneself in deeper.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:31 PMA revolting example of a fumble in the greasy till. Or is it just some twisted application of the ends justifies the means?
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:47 PMDrip.........drip..............drip........................drip.....................................drip
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 12:49 PM“a fumble in the greasy till”
Sounds like a euphemism for something very un Free Presbyterian.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:10 PM“a fumble in the greasy till”
Sounds like a euphemism for something very un Free Presbyterian.
Posted by Ziznivy on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:10 PMYou think so? More like just what you’d expect....
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:16 PMfumble in the greasy till - September 1913 by WB Yeats
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:19 PMNice bit of work Pete tying these two threads - and a seriously scarey thought that these loopers may actually get their foot in the door at the causeway.
The idea that Finn McCool built the causeway is infinitely more probable than it popping up as a result of a flood 4500 years ago. I mean have these people even tried to expain what actual physical and chemical processes may have been at work during a flood to produce the causeway? We’re not even remotely in the area of sedimentary deposits. This is beyond ridicule - is is an embarassment. Simply ignore the facts and stick to the most outlandish story, because, ahhh, because.... ahhhh well JUST because!!Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:26 PMShould the DUP ministers be nervous, Bemused? They can hardly stop the drips.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:27 PMIan Paisley MP MLA is entitled to lobby on behalf of his constituent and party member with whoever he chooses (including the right to treat young earth creationism as equally valid as evolution).
However:
1 He is not entitled to misrepresent UNESCO support - and the implication of the Telegraph article is that either he or Mr Sweeney is being economical with the truth.
2 The First Minister is obliged to refrain from any bias on the basis of personal affiliation where he has to take decisions as a Minister.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:38 PMThere was nothing that neutered the Shinners faster than power - no wonder Paisley steered clear of it for as long as he did.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:56 PMIan, IMO the DUP can’t wriggle out. It knew that Seaport had lost out on the present visitor’s site in February 2002 long before the lobbying in 2003.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 01:58 PMI have a radical plan that will solve the whole Causeay debacle. As we all know (and as some famouse bloke once said), “worth seeing, not worth going to see..” or something like that. Therefore we put up big pictures of the Causeway at various places (airports, ports etc) with a caption that reads,
“The Giants Causeway....a load of rocks in funny shapes, a geological phenomenom, or possibly made by a big giant called Finn - now you don’t need to go. Sure there’s no car park and nothing to do once you’ve seen the rocks.”
Or if you don’t like that idea, chisel out one of the rocks and put it on a mobile display and drive it around the country, I mean when you’ve seen one rock you’ve literally seen them all!! This will save millions in building costs, planning fees and whatever the hell else they want to waste OUR money on.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 02:02 PMApologies for rubbish spelling above, typing quicker than my internal dictionary could cope with.
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 02:04 PMLottery Grant???
Is that not encouraging gambling?
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 02:16 PMThe DUP might be good protestants but they really have no idea about how to govern
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 03:21 PMSir Herbert,
Would bad protestants be better? Or what about good catholics?
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 05:08 PMI don’t mean good in the angelic sense. Personally I couldn’t give a F**k what religion anyone is. I’m much more concerned when someone running the country doesn’t know their arse from their elbow, a la DUP
Posted by on Oct 04, 2007 @ 05:17 PM
