Thursday, March 27, 2008
Football friendlies round-up
Northern Ireland had a comfortable 4-1 victory over Georgia. England lost 1-0 to France. Scotland drew 1-1 with Croatia. Wales won 2-0 over Luxembuorg.
Fair Deal @ 12:16 AM
I’ll be gentle, for sock-puppets have emotions, too.
Posted by on Mar 27, 2008 @ 11:48 PMReassuring that you’re still keeping your heads in the sand, Gav and Stacey,… sorry,I mean Doctor, of course.
Personally I don’t mind your sizeable neanderthal element singing their beloved sectarian war-chant just so long as that sates the old tribal bloodlust nowadays.
Better that than issuing mortal threats against your own players. Those indeed were the days, my friends-eh,Stacey?
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 12:28 AMNice to see the three sporting organisations presenting a united front today in relation to the pointless request for yet another Stormont committee meeting.
Their unified support in favour of the Maze Project has shown our local politicos the true meaning of working in partnership.
How pompous did David McNarry appear on the news linking this measured decision with the recent controversies over players’ dissent and bad behaviour.-Was that the best he could do? He was like a farcical hybrid of Ron Manager and Jimmy Young.
Well done to the IFA, GAA and Ulster Rugnby officials involved and a fitting response to those opponents who want to remain in the sectarian trenches.
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 12:47 AMGavBelfast
“enjoy telling big juicy porkies”
Are you claiming that there wasn’t a big chant of “No Surrender” during GSTQ then? I think anyone (with normal hearing) who was either at the game or saw on TV (such as myself) would disagree.
If you are claiming that it wasn’t chanted then you are either a liar or in dire need of a hearing aid.
I don’t know why anyone is surprised though, a large section of the “GAWA” chant it at every NI game.
It just shows that sectarianism doesn’t appear to have been eradicated at NI matches as OWC and the GAWA claim.
It also clearly shows that these morons are more interested in taunting and provoking Catholics than in respecting “their” anthem.
Yet when the majority of Catholics choose to support the RoI and/or choose to represent the RoI, they are labelled as bigots.
You couldn’t make it up.
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 06:06 AM“Yet when the majority of Catholics choose to support the RoI and/or choose to represent the RoI, they are labelled as bigots.
You couldn’t make it up.”
Er.. you just have.
There’s never been any survey taken or proper academic study which establishes what percentage of RCs support NI or the Republic. Just because all the trolls and their families on slugger clearly do, is not proof that ordinary people with real lives do. Noone knows if all, none, or even 50% +1 RCs support the Republic, but you presume it’s a majority Billy.Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 10:02 AMJust to clarify, the real GAWA (Green and White Army) are of course the Limerick Hurling Team.
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 10:33 AM“Just to clarify, the real GAWA (Green and White Army) are of course the Limerick Hurling Team.”
Who are ya? Who are ya? etc, etc,
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 10:42 AM“It also clearly shows that these morons are more interested in taunting and provoking Catholics than in respecting “their” anthem.”
Just to clarify Billy - do you as (I presume) a Catholic find the “no surrender to the IRA” sentiment a provocative taunt because you are a Catholic then?Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 10:45 AMHere we go, the usual bollox everytime NI play.
As someone who cares little for GSTQ I find it rather ironic that the usual suspects on this forum find the “No Surrender” add on by a minority of NI fans offensive. Surely the only person it is likely to cause offense ro is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and you can rest assured she wasn´t watching.
Johnny beat the rap
“Better that than issuing mortal threats against your own players. Those indeed were the days, my friends-eh,Stacey?”
You´ve lost me there fella, did you enjoy the match or did you only watch the build up to get offended.
Anyway great first half performance from OWC, did descend into farce with the amount of substitutions and Lifield appearances. Surely the second half would´ve been ideal to give Dean Shiels, Ivan Sproule and Grant McCann a run out. Strange as well that when Capaldi is in top form with FA Cup semi finalists Cardiff City, he no longer gets into OWC squad.
Big Lafferty continues to improve and really has the makings of top class player, good luck to him.
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 01:51 PM“Democratic” - What a laugh!
“Just to clarify Billy - do you as (I presume) a Catholic find the “no surrender to the IRA” sentiment a provocative taunt because you are a Catholic then?”
I have no time for any terrorist groups as my track record on this forum clearly shows.
It’s interesting how the GAWA chant anti-IRA stuff but don’t chant any anti UVF/UDA/LVF stuff.
Nothing like consistency eh?Why chant anything about any terrorist group anyway? I though NI support was now a politics free zone where supporters of all religions and none were equally welcome.
Yeah - right!
The question was about “No Surrender” being chanted during GSTQ. This happens at EVERY NI match from a large section of the “GAWA”
Frankly, if the IFA want to retain GSTQ as the pre soccer anthem and the ‘GAWA’ want to chant “No Surrender” during it (clearly to let any Catholic supporters know their place), that’s fine.
However, it’s just laughable when supporters of the north come on and criticise Catholics who won’t support them as bigots. Who exactly is doing this chanting again?
Perhaps, we would just rather follow a team who value our support, and where we don’t have to “know our place” to be welcome.
Posted by on Mar 28, 2008 @ 10:23 PM“Surely the only person it is likely to cause offense ro is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and you can rest assured she wasn´t watching.”
erm Doctor who are ya.
I was watching. Last goal was in off the arm.
OK, I was pleased, but surely the umpires should have detected that the striker was INSIDE the small parallelogram and informed the ref accordingly.
Posted by on Mar 29, 2008 @ 12:03 AMDarth
“There’s never been any survey taken or proper academic study which establishes what percentage of RCs support NI or the Republic”
Please don’t presume to lecture me about what people think in the RC/Nationalist community.
As I was born and bred in the Nationalist/RC community, I think I’m a lot better placed than you to judge the mood.
It’s so pathetic when NI supporters come on here with the “I know a couple of Catholics who sit behind me at every NI game and they love the craic” line.
I can confidently say that I have a lot more family, friends and business connections within the Nationalist/RC community than you’ll ever have.
I would say that there isn’t as much antagonism towards the NI team as in the past but that’s about it.
The very little progress that the IFA made in getting Nationalist/RC support was largely undone by the ill-advised attempts to deny Nationalists their right to opt for the RoI.
I know only 1 Catholic who is an ardent NI fan. I know a very few others who would perhaps give lukewarm support.
The vast majority (99%)of Nationalist/RC soccer fans that I know are fervent RoI supporters and are largely ambivalent to the fortunes of the NI team.
If the RoI team can fulfill their undoubted potential under Trappatoni, I suspect that increasing numbers of Nationalist/RC players will take up their option to declare for them.
If the GAWA choose to retain GSTQ and their vocal “No Surrender” chants, I don’t know why you expect Nationalists/RCs to support them.
If you want to delude yourself that a majority of Nationalists/RCs ( or even a sizeable number) support NI, that’s your problem. I think anyone with a realistic view knows that it simply is not the case.
If the “GAWA” keep up their current behaviour, I think that number (already very small) will decrease even more.
Posted by on Mar 29, 2008 @ 01:30 AMThis probably isn’t the right place for it, and perhaps I might have just missed it, but I find it shocking that none of the regular contributors have found the apres match city centre antics on Saturday nor the bullet in the mail to Eddie Patterson of Clintonville to be blog worthy.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 02:15 AMYou never even answered my question Billy - just went into one of your usual propagandist rants with your fingers in your ears - why would either of us even bother to post AT each other! Too be honest like the poster above I’m actually quite shocked that you haven’t tried to connect the NI supporters to the scumfest last Saturday - though I suppose you’ve time yet.
Oh and you can stick your ad homs’ too my friend…Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 10:45 AM‘This probably isn’t the right place for it, and perhaps I might have just missed it, but I find it shocking that none of the regular contributors have found the apres match city centre antics on Saturday nor the bullet in the mail to Eddie Patterson of Clintonville to be blog worthy.’
i thought it strange as well, until i remembered that it was usual form for them boyos. Remember the lovely cards Neil Lennon got. But I wonder if the Govt will try and portray the bullet in the post to Eddie Patterson as some form of Loyalist decomissioning.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 10:51 AMDemocratic
You seem to have a problem with the English language - I am not offended by no surrender to the IRA since I don’t support them or any other terrorist organisation.
Why chant anything at all about any terrorist group? and/or why single out one group and completely ignore “loyalist” terrorists?
It simply shows that the “GAWA” are still a Protestant/Unionist clique where Catholics who “know their place” are tolerated.
To date, I have seen nothing in the media to associate NI fans with the trouble on Saturday so why would I try to link them?
As far as I am aware, it was a gang of Linfield “fans” although I now understand that there was some National Front involvement.
I will continue to criticise the GAWA for things that they have actually done (such as the No Surrender chants).
However, unlike some people on this site. I am interested in FACTS. I have seen no evidence associating NI fans with this trouble so I’m not accusing them of something that is nothing to do with them.
It’s quite simple logic really.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 11:08 AMHowever, unlike some people on this site. I am interested in FACTS
How do you explain your previous lies, then, Billy Liar? Remember your lies about the anti-sectarian campaign at NI matches? And your lies about me?
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 11:11 AMBilly - thanks for instructing me on my poor english comprehension I will endeavour to do better in future. You did answer the question this time though contrary to what you said before and it is nice to see you admit that the No Surrender to the IRA sentiment is neither religiously sectarian nor in any way offensive to Roman Catholicism as a whole. If it is offensive because some people choose to support the IRA that are Catholics or because some Catholics are Republican/Nationalist by virtue of their politics then that is a separate matter and I would appreciate it you would use the correct terminology next time you go off on one. Apart from that could luck on your anti-NI crusade and as a parting comment to you I would say that I would like the whole No Surrender canned as well ASAP - if only just to stop giving certain propagandists a “free kick” to put the boot in once or twice a month....
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 11:35 AMBilly is obsessed. He crawls out of the woodwork every time there’s a thread about the Northern Ireland team.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 12:16 PMGiven Billy Liar’s noble declaration that he’s only interested in “facts”, this is a good opportunity for him to retract LIES which he told repeatedly on this site last year.
1. In the thread “A November Night Revisited”, at 1.15am on 6th August, he said that the IFA had only made strides against sectarianism “because the publicity they got from the Neil Lennon death threat forced them to do so”. It was pointed out to him several times that the IFA’s anti-sectarian campaign had begun many years before said death threat, but still Billy refused to retract the lie. Indeed, he actually repeated the lie – in the thread “IFA provoking political row over football eligibility?” at 11.37pm on 20th August.
2. In the former thread, in the same post, he also lied by stating that “In a match prior to the death threat, Neil Lennon had endured a torrid 90 minutes where his every touch was booed by the majority of NI fans. McIlroy more or less glossed over it and the IFA said nothing”. In actual fact, Lennon was booed by a small MINORITY of “fans”, cheered by more, and the IFA condemned it, held a press conference and introduced a code of conduct as a result. Lennon was also roundly cheered by the vast majority of fans at the next match.
3. In the latter thread, at 10.48am on 23rd August, he made scurrilous personal allegations against myself:
(a) claiming that I denied “that Windsor was ever a cold house for Catholics” (I have never denied this);
(b) claiming that I denied “that Linfield didn’t sign Catholics for many years” (again, I have never denied this); and
(c) claiming that I “think [I] can deny the anti-Catholic sectarianism that blighted NI football for decades” and that I “try to portray that everything is perfect now” (totally untrue).
Billy Liar was unable to back up these personal allegations, yet refused to retract them. I now challenge Billy Liar to show some integrity and retract his lies.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 12:24 PMWhere has Billy gone?
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 03:15 PMAcross the water, football pundits and fans always refer to N. Ireland and their fans as ‘the Irish’ and they’re perceived as being distinctively and admirably Irish just as the Scotland, Wales and England football teams and fans have their own identity…of course, this makes perfect sense & is just as it should be and it pleases me that the only people that this is likely to irritate are extreme Loyalists clinging tenuously to ‘Britishness’ or Norn Iron-haters who think to be ‘really Irish’ you have to exclusively support the Republic…those who seek every excuse for perpetuating and maintaining sectarian schism in Ulster are a sorry bunch and should be pitied rather than despised…
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 04:41 PMGlad to see Martin O,Neill & Pat Jennings coming out in favour of an all Ireland team, just as George Best, Derek Dougan & Lennon did before them.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 05:01 PMJennings has spoken about wish for an all Ireland team before & seems just as keen now.
“It’s the bureaucracy involved in changing things that has always been the problem, and it’s a measure of the opposition there was to the (1973) fixture from the IFA that the team had to play under the guise of a Shamrock Rovers XI.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/7324995.stm
O’Neill, Jennings & Hamiltom were all in Dublin to commemorate the ‘all Ireland team of 1973.
http://www.fai.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3035
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 07:11 PMCharlie
those who seek every excuse for perpetuating and maintaining sectarian schism in Ulster are a sorry bunch and should be pitied rather than despised…
I know, I know.... Unionists should really vote to get rids of the border.
My flag is the Tricolour. My anthem is the Soldier’s Song. Those are the symbols that have emotional pull. I am a citizen of the Republic and carry an Irish passport and am proud of it. I despise monarchy and would be happier for God to drown them all than save them. Which team am I going to go for, which team is representative of me, realistically here? It is independent of what Unionists or the English or anyone else thinks.
Posted by on Apr 01, 2008 @ 07:17 PM
