Interview with outgoing Alliance leader David Ford

david-ford-interview-stillDavid Ford has always been candid about not wishing to hold on as leader of the Alliance Party any longer than necessary. After fifteen years of being re-elected to the position each year, he has given up waiting for a tap on the shoulder and taken matters into his own hands and announced that tomorrow at noon his resignation as party leader will take effect. A three week process of nominations and election will return a new leader on Wednesday 26 October.

Interviewed this afternoon he explained that as well as his fifteenth anniversary being a round number …

… we have the new Assembly team in place, well established individuals showing leadership in their committees, in the chamber and in their constituencies, and a number of private members bills underway. So it is right, now, that somebody else should get the opportunity to take up the baton and take the next step forward for the party.

He singled out the personal privilege of being “the first local Justice Minister for 38 years” as significant during his time as leader as well as the election of Naomi Long to Westminster. He also remembered the “difficulties around the flags dispute” with the threats and attacks on colleagues and their offices.

The party hasn’t lost an Assembly seat under his leadership though he admits that “we haven’t made massive gains”.

We have moved from a position that in 2003 we had six seats but there were only three of them really safe, to a point where all eight were safe this year and indeed there could have been another two, three, maybe even four if we’d stretched it – we just didn’t have that particular luck this year.

He doesn’t think the party has “any significant regrets” during his period in charge: “we have had the opportunity to make our mark, we’ve clearly stood out as a party with a different philosophy, a different background, and I think that is shown in the way we’ve conducted ourselves and had that, admittedly, modest growth …

The party still faces “the challenge … to continue to put forward our proposals to build a united community to make a real difference to this society”.

There is clearly much to be criticised in how the current Executive is conducting itself. The challenge will be to do it in the context of a different, alternative vision and not just nit-picking around minor details. We can join with others on some areas, but I think we still have a unique vision …

It won’t be a coronation on 26 October.

Even if there were only one candidate’s name put forward, they still have to be seen to have the confidence of Party Council. [Ed – that’s 50% + 1 of the 250 council members.]

David Ford is vague about how long he will remain MLA for South Antrim. He pivots the question away from dates and times to explain that “I have plenty to keep me occupied at the moment”. He’ll be occupying himself with his return to the Agriculture and Environment Committee, spending more time on constituency issues “which get somewhat neglected if you have a busy ministerial diary” and his private members bill around abortion in the case of fatal foetal abnormality.

So there’s plenty to keep me going for a while.

But beyond next summer?

If you think all those things are going to be done by next summer you’re more optimistic about procedures in this place than I am!

Succession planning is important in this and all constituencies with single Alliance representatives elected to the Assembly. Having attending the Boundary Commission hearing this morning, he notes that there will “very significant change whatever happens to South Antrim constituency”. In fact the party might be looking for two successors across the new constituencies.

The Alliance leader’s phone is overwhelmed with kind messages today. Amongst the tributes he hopes “there is something there that people can say that Alliance stands for [and] I had the pleasure of being the leader of that team”. And “the Department of Justice achieved things in six years that were perhaps more than what some people thought would be possible”.

And the question he’s been asked most often today: would he accept a peerage (assuming the Lib Dems nominate him next year)?

Awk, not that old one again!

I have made it clear that the last time I was offered a peerage was when David Trimble was trying to do a deal around a Westminster election. My commitment is to the people of South Antrim who sent me to the Assembly five times [and] to the work that has to be done in Stormont.

While there’s a popular belief shared by politicians in other parties that David Ford is a power-hungry political animal, it’s never come across when I’ve interviewed him. He’s definitely not in a rush to jump to “the other place” and perhaps even reluctant to see the value of doing so.

I really am too old to think about jumping on a plane every week to go to London.

Time will tell.

, , ,

  • mjh

    He has served his party for more than 40 years (he was the party’s election organiser in South Antrim in the late 1970’s). His long years of service in back-room capacities before standing for election himself shows how little his political career has been driven by ego and how much by principled commitment.

    It is probably this quality which has enabled him to be that rarity among party leaders – an exception to Enoch Powell’s dictum that all political careers end in failure – one who leaves that office under no pressure and at a time of his own choosing.

  • tmitch57

    I interviewed Oliver Napier, the second Alliance leader, back in 1998 shortly after the GFA had been negotiated. He said that he retired when he did because he didn’t want to end up like John Hume or Ian Paisley (one could well add Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to the quote)–party leaders who tarnish their legacies by staying on too long. So this is kind of an Alliance tradition.