Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past

Thu 23 May 2013, 11:40am

Another conference, another raking over old ground?  Perhaps – but the DPP Barra McGrory made an interesting speech  at the well-cast transitional justice conference in Belfast.

“I think society has got to make a choice. Either it decides now to go down the route, the very difficult route, of determining that we are going to forego the investigation and prosecution of the past in favour of embedding the political institutions or the peace process, or between that and deciding whether or not the peace process is best served by continuing to prosecute the past…” .

“If it is going to be the latter then I think there needs to be a very clear investigative structure established with very clear lines of definition and with significant resources and if that is going to be done it needs to have terms of reference which will cover all criminality from all sides.

“The prosecutorial aspect of this will have to be significantly resourced as well. That has not yet happened.”

This sounds appropriately  even handed. And yet McGrory knows like everybody else that likelihood of the local parties – and the British government – agreeing “ terms of reference.. to.. cover criminality on all sides” are  just about  nil. And resources are something else.  Westminster signaled long ago that not an extra penny more will be provided for this; indeed the budget is being progressively reduced.

It’s true of course that Stormont’s  legal responsibility is limited ; there are other stakeholders, other DPPs,  police forces , two sovereign governments , all have a role. At the moment Westminster shrugs, a mite disingenuously, saying that all depends on Stormont. Not over the Army and MI5 it doesn’t. Their favoured approach remains, which is to open the heavily redacted closed cases archive 30 or 40 years after the crime.

In one sense McGrory as an independent prosecutor needs little guidance.  He can prosecute if there is more than a 50% chance of securing a conviction. What’s keeping him? He has access to the Stevens report on collusion; he can order cold paramilitary cases to be reopened. We can draw our own conclusions. In many cases the evidence may be cumulatively damning but in individual cases the evidence is not strong enough to stand up in court. Omerta prevails on all sides.

McGrory knows that for all their bluster none of the political parties has the slightest interest in exhuming  old sins  and no leverage exists to make them do it – except that from members of the criminal justice system like Barra McGrory. . And as I read it,McGrory is telling axe grinding politicians and the campaigners that he aint going to do anything much on his own.So the argument is circular and the deadlock is complete.

By itself this is a dangerously arbitrary situation which leaves far too much power to the operational independence of this or any police service or prosecutor. Sinn Fein have made their inevitable protest against the arrest and charging of John Downey.in the tradition of their objections to the arrest and conviction of Gerry McGeough.  Everyone also knows surely that if such prosecutions proliferate they could have  destabilising potential and diminish whatever faint hopes remain of former republican paramilitaries coming clean, local pressures notwithstanding.

We await PSNI action on the Boston College tapes. Anything new on the Stevens and de Silva reports anyone?  A formal amnesty is rejected. So deadlock remains, smothered in  verbal chaff.  There are two choices:  let the whole business run on and on and on until the campaigners are exhausted and  the public wish to move on is finally  exposed : or the two governments give public advice jointly that further prosecutions are not in the public interest.  This would have no legal status  but might send a powerful signal to the independent enforcers. For the Republic there would be the little matter of the clearing up the Dublin and Monaghan bombs first..

Dealing with the Past is intractable.  It should be decoupled from dealing with parades and  protests, the rubbing points of today which need to be tackled . But for all of this,  the time for ending humbug and hypocrisy is long overdue. There is danger in delay.

Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Delicious Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Digg Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Facebook Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Google+ Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on LinkedIn Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Pinterest Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on reddit Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on StumbleUpon Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Twitter Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Email Share 'End now the old pretence that we want to deal with the past' on Print Friendly

Comments (5)

  1. Barnshee (profile) says:

    On the QT they have adopted Plan A – the old largely British method of doing nothing and waiting for everyone concerned or affected to die. The “truth” will come out 50 or more years down the line when its too late to hold anyone responsible.

    Occasionally they are pulled up by “events dear boy (events”-Downey, McGeough etc) however Plan A will continue -there is no real Plan B.

    Don`t hold your breath there is still the “100 year rule ” on holding back disclosure information by government. (interestingly as far as I am aware there are still items surrounding 1916-20 in Ireland still under wraps)

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. Mick Fealty (profile) says:

    Brian, this is the crux here:

    “McGrory knows that for all their bluster none of the political parties has the slightest interest in exhuming old sins and no leverage exists to make them do it..”

    Much as I deeply admire the courage, the wit and the resourcefulness of many of the campaigns for truth and justice, this is the grinding truth of the matter.

    The patient and endlessly repetitive protests to the contrary are little more than “sound and fury, signifying nothing”.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. tacapall (profile) says:

    So true Barnshee, Sinn Fein has learned the hard way just like the Finucanes and all the others throughout the centuries who have found to their cost, never trust the British government to keep its word, never trust the British government to act with integrity.

    No-one is above the law, well no-one is supposed to be but in this bubble we live in being seen to be doing the right thing is determined by whether your a unionist or a nationalist, republican or loyalist. The process will not survive much longer if the elephant in the room of collusion is not addressed while non state actors are being pursued for historic crimes, its becoming a farce.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. tuatha (profile) says:

    And Truth & Reconcilliation tribunals around the world have been so … sumthin, sumtin.
    On tuther hand, when Menachim Begin can become Israeli PM despite/because of the King David Hotel bombing and his leadership of Irgun, anything is possible… such as Adams & McG being now Ministers, not to mention TD as well for ole SteelEyes.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. Nevin (profile) says:

    transitional justice conference in Belfast.”

    Transitional justice and transitional truth sound somewhat exotic. Are these activities publicly funded? Do they serve any useful purpose other than job creation schemes?

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2014 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
47 queries. 0.344 seconds.