Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”

Tue 11 December 2012, 1:36pm

As an Irish News report noted today, the Northern Ireland Audit Office has released a report examining “the delivery of £1,600 million in reported efficiency savings by Northern Ireland government departments between 2008 and 2011.”  I don’t have time to delve into the detail in the report [pdf file 1.2mb], but here are the main findings noted in the associated press release.

The measurement of departmental efficiencies

It is important that all planned efficiency savings are capable of being measured. Although there is extensive guidance on best practice in measuring efficiency savings this has not been followed in most of the projects the Audit Office examined.

14 of the 42 projects reviewed did not have the basic financial and performance information necessary for the Audit Office to make an informed judgment on whether efficiency savings had been achieved.  In addition, in 13 of the projects the types of activities undertaken did not meet the definition of an efficiency saving.

15 projects are likely to have achieved real efficiency savings. However, in  4 of these projects there is some risk that the quality of service to users has been adversely affected. It was a key feature of the Programme that savings should not be achieved by simply cutting services to priority frontline services.

Management of the Efficiencies Delivery Programme

The Audit Office identified a number of weaknesses in the management of the Efficiency Delivery Programme. Guidance provided to departments was not sufficiently detailed and guidance issued was not always fully implemented.

Departments produced and published Efficiency Delivery Plans setting out what savings they planned and how these would be achieved. However, Efficiency Delivery Plans lacked detail on the rationale for the chosen efficiencies and the basis of measurement, and offered insufficient assurance that front line services were being protected.

Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.

Now, about that distraction…

Adds From the Belfast Telegraph report

In some cases there was a reduction in the budget and a cut in service delivery, or income was raised by introducing new or increased charges which passed the cost on to the user, the report said.

Capital projects were postponed or cancelled and unit costs increased.

The Department for Regional Development (DRD) generated savings by withdrawing, from 2008-09, an annual £2.1 million bus route subsidy paid to transport company Translink. Services provided by Ulsterbus have been reduced on low use routes and timetables.

The report said: “Northern Ireland Audit Office (NIAO) considers that this saving is not an efficiency as it has resulted in a reduction in service delivery.”

Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Delicious Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Digg Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Facebook Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Google+ Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on LinkedIn Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Pinterest Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on reddit Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on StumbleUpon Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Twitter Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Add to Bookmarks Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Email Share '“Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.”' on Print Friendly

Comments (4)

  1. Los Lobos (profile) says:

    The withdrawing of millions of pounds from the DRD budget in 08-09 happened around the same time Conor Murphy was slashing budgets in order that money could be freed up and put towards the A5 project! That the entire Government were gung ho and wreckless in how this was achieved demonstrates the type of politics we have in NI – the politics of illusion.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. I noticed the report in this morning’s Irish News and read through some of the NIAO report on the train. Pretty damning in terms of what has been categorised as an efficiency and how loose DFP were in monitoring the quality of efficiency savings.

    Though I have some sympathy for the departments who desperately wanted not to be the one that would not achieve their target. Measuring things changes the participants’ behaviour – it’s the Hawthorne effect applied to government.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. sherdy (profile) says:

    So reporting of inefficiencies was inefficient!

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. NOT NOW JOHN (profile) says:

    “Overall, the Audit Office found that the reporting of efficiencies was not comprehensive, transparent or meaningful.” ….. and so what? Will heads roll? Will DRD be required to reinstate the £2.1m bus route subsidy and find a real efficiency saving elsewhere? Does anyone really take any notice of what the Audit Office says anymore?

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2014 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
45 queries. 0.465 seconds.