Peace Process Parallels: Northern Ireland and the Middle-East

In the wake of the UN decision to recognise the state of Palestine (albeit not as a full member of the UN) it seems timely to return to the question of parallels between the peace process here and in the Middle East, most recently highlighted on Slugger in relation to remarks by former US envoy Richard Haass.

The decision by many firm allies of the US to support the Palestinian bid despite US opposition was one of the most striking aspects of the vote. Many of these states clearly believed that it was important to produce pressure for compromise on the part of the stronger party in this case (Israel) by strengthening the weaker party (Palestine). It also served the purpose of demonstrating to Palestinians that political progress by peaceful means is possible.

At a symposium on Negotiating Peace in Galway last November former senior MI6 officer Michael Oatley drew some striking parallels between the conflicts in Ireland and the Middle-East (Video here: sound quality improves after the first couple of minutes).

His remarks are particularly significant because of the pivotal role he played in back-channel communication between the British government and the Provisional Republican leadership for many years. They reflect too his long experience at the highest levels of the British Intelligence system, as former MI6 Controller for the Middle East, Controller for Europe and subsequently  MI6 Director of Counter-terrorism.

The occasion for his talk was the donation of the papers of intermediary Brendan Duddy to the National University of Ireland Galway. Oatley spoke primarily about his work with Brendan Duddy and his personal experience in the North but he also drew direct parallels with the contemporary conflict in Israel/Palestine.

Also speaking at the symposium were former senior Irish diplomat Seán Ó hUiginn who played a crucial central role in the peace process (video) and Professor Paul Arthur, former Professor of Politics at the University of Ulster (video). All three speakers elaborated on their remarks in the Q and A session that followed.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.