Purvis resignation: The Hobbesian view…

Sorry for the three posts on the same subject in a couple of hours, but I think Mark Devenport’s blog piece flags up an interesting Hobbsian aspect of the Purvis resignation:

Having condemned the murder of Bobby Moffett and the subsequent intimidation of people in the Shankill area, Dawn Purvis today went an extra mile by parting company altogether with the UVF’s political wing, the PUP. Cynics may note that this puts her Stormont allowances beyond the grasp of any future sanction from the Independent Monitoring Commission.

However as Mark goes on to note:

Ms Purvis never relished the role of explaining away UVF transgressions – she clearly had no stomach to act as a mouthpiece for those who ordered Mr Moffett’s death. David Ervine’s widow Jeanette has described the murder as “the last straw*” and blamed “a handful of people who don’t want politics.”

It’s also, at this point, worth pointing out The Dissenter’s view of where this leaves Purvis’ voters in an earlier thread on Slugger…

If, as claimed, Purvis speaks (spoke) for ‘loyalism’ then she has disenfranchised that electorate by resigning from all, but keeping the salary.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.