<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Committee on the Administration of Justice&#8217;s latest newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/</link>
	<description>Conversation, politics and stray insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: just wonderin'</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363876</link>
		<dc:creator>just wonderin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363876</guid>
		<description>Seamus O&#039;R: sadly, Stephen&#039;s body was never found but he is presumed dead. May he rest in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seamus O&#8217;R: sadly, Stephen&#8217;s body was never found but he is presumed dead. May he rest in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seamus O'Riordan</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363871</link>
		<dc:creator>Seamus O'Riordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363871</guid>
		<description>I see via Google that Stephen was presumed dead as of 20th March 2004....was his body ever found....does anyone know?

He was a great legal academic....but wouldn&#039;t have been a great advocate in the courts...he&#039;d have got you 6 months jail for riding a bike without lights!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see via Google that Stephen was presumed dead as of 20th March 2004&#8230;.was his body ever found&#8230;.does anyone know?</p>
<p>He was a great legal academic&#8230;.but wouldn&#8217;t have been a great advocate in the courts&#8230;he&#8217;d have got you 6 months jail for riding a bike without lights!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just wonderin'</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363865</link>
		<dc:creator>just wonderin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363865</guid>
		<description>Trev - there is not diversity in the CAJ as only Republican or possibly nationalist Prods or Taigs are welcomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trev &#8211; there is not diversity in the CAJ as only Republican or possibly nationalist Prods or Taigs are welcomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trev</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363862</link>
		<dc:creator>Trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363862</guid>
		<description>CAJ&#039;s own &#039;workforce balance&#039; has been pretty impressive. I wonder if it has too many Prods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAJ&#8217;s own &#8216;workforce balance&#8217; has been pretty impressive. I wonder if it has too many Prods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanAlan</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363761</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanAlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363761</guid>
		<description>No matter what you think of CAJ, and my own views are substantially different from the majority of posters, there is still a need for public interest litigation. Yes, organisations have consistently chosen the cases that they take, and perhaps they need to consider the balance of those cases from a range of perspectives.

Nevertheless, is there anyone who would deny that the following paragraph from the article on the launch of PILS (quoted above) does not provide sufficient evidence for the potential benefit afforded by public interest litigation.

&quot;Previous PIL cases in Northern Ireland
taken by other organisations have resulted
in the right to transport to school during
respite care for a severely disabled young
person; a successful challenge to the
decision to continue to detain a mental
health patient in hospital which was based
largely on a lack of adequate suitable
community accommodation; and a
successful challenge to a Health and
Social Services Trust’s decision to move
an elderly man to a less expensive
residential care home because neither he or his only relative could afford to pay the third party top up charge of £20 per week. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what you think of CAJ, and my own views are substantially different from the majority of posters, there is still a need for public interest litigation. Yes, organisations have consistently chosen the cases that they take, and perhaps they need to consider the balance of those cases from a range of perspectives.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, is there anyone who would deny that the following paragraph from the article on the launch of PILS (quoted above) does not provide sufficient evidence for the potential benefit afforded by public interest litigation.</p>
<p>&#8220;Previous PIL cases in Northern Ireland<br />
taken by other organisations have resulted<br />
in the right to transport to school during<br />
respite care for a severely disabled young<br />
person; a successful challenge to the<br />
decision to continue to detain a mental<br />
health patient in hospital which was based<br />
largely on a lack of adequate suitable<br />
community accommodation; and a<br />
successful challenge to a Health and<br />
Social Services Trust’s decision to move<br />
an elderly man to a less expensive<br />
residential care home because neither he or his only relative could afford to pay the third party top up charge of £20 per week. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty McG</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363743</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363743</guid>
		<description>The CAJ to the best of my knowledge have only ever supported one case involving Protestants, the UDR 4 case.  Their personnel have in the main been Nationalist/Republicans with Directors who have been leading lights / Chiefs of Republican Prisoners groups.

As to Stephen Livingstone, many&#039;s the argument I had with him over the CAJ and other self-styled &#039;yuman rites&#039; organisations, who had no problem colluding with terrorists throughout Northern Ireland, as they both sought to demean the state, one through terrorism, the other through perceived wrongs and questionable allegations of abuse by these self, same terrorists.

By the way, did Stephen&#039;s body ever turn up?  It was sad that he seemed to suddenly vanish off the face of the earth.  He was a very bright guy, an excellent legal mind and not scared of articulating his views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CAJ to the best of my knowledge have only ever supported one case involving Protestants, the UDR 4 case.  Their personnel have in the main been Nationalist/Republicans with Directors who have been leading lights / Chiefs of Republican Prisoners groups.</p>
<p>As to Stephen Livingstone, many&#8217;s the argument I had with him over the CAJ and other self-styled &#8216;yuman rites&#8217; organisations, who had no problem colluding with terrorists throughout Northern Ireland, as they both sought to demean the state, one through terrorism, the other through perceived wrongs and questionable allegations of abuse by these self, same terrorists.</p>
<p>By the way, did Stephen&#8217;s body ever turn up?  It was sad that he seemed to suddenly vanish off the face of the earth.  He was a very bright guy, an excellent legal mind and not scared of articulating his views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneill</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363721</link>
		<dc:creator>oneill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363721</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Well what a nice wee circle of people feeding of each others prejudices. sure we don’t want any uppity fenian lawyers...&lt;/em&gt;

Rapunsel

Why the use of the sectarian epithet? Does it mean that criticism of lawyers is now to be filed under the &quot;religious bigotry&quot; classification? 
Are there any other professions that we should go easy on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Well what a nice wee circle of people feeding of each others prejudices. sure we don’t want any uppity fenian lawyers&#8230;</em></p>
<p>Rapunsel</p>
<p>Why the use of the sectarian epithet? Does it mean that criticism of lawyers is now to be filed under the &#8220;religious bigotry&#8221; classification?<br />
Are there any other professions that we should go easy on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Windrush III</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363717</link>
		<dc:creator>George Windrush III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363717</guid>
		<description>Looks like everyone thinks NI is some sort of international basket case that good people around the world want to help.

Annoying it may be, but it&#039;s clear that NI can&#039;t help itself,

It certainly can&#039;t pay its own way, and is something of a vagrant on the world stage.

There&#039;s a limit to how much others are prepared to pay for a unionist unwillingness to relate to and work with their neighbours.

We stopped that nonsense in Alabama in 1960/70s. Why should we still have to be playing wetnurse to unionists in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like everyone thinks NI is some sort of international basket case that good people around the world want to help.</p>
<p>Annoying it may be, but it&#8217;s clear that NI can&#8217;t help itself,</p>
<p>It certainly can&#8217;t pay its own way, and is something of a vagrant on the world stage.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a limit to how much others are prepared to pay for a unionist unwillingness to relate to and work with their neighbours.</p>
<p>We stopped that nonsense in Alabama in 1960/70s. Why should we still have to be playing wetnurse to unionists in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just wonderin'</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363707</link>
		<dc:creator>just wonderin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363707</guid>
		<description>Sorry about mistake when posing the question as to who are the Directors/Trustees of the Human Rights ...should have added,Trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about mistake when posing the question as to who are the Directors/Trustees of the Human Rights &#8230;should have added,Trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just wonderin'</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363706</link>
		<dc:creator>just wonderin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363706</guid>
		<description>First of all, it is regretable that Martin O&#039;Brien chose the memorial to Stephen Livingstone to produce the views outlined above - Stephen was a person to be admired.
Secondly, I am surprised that noone has mentioned so far that well known fact that AA system of funding is such that noone can apply to them! No, they believe that their staff are so talented (and so objective presumably) that they identify what is important to fund (I rest my case).

Thirdly re the Human Rights Trust which receives so much from AA - my understanding is that it was set up by - Martin O&#039;Brien when he was Director of CAJ so that CAJ would be secure (hence pensions for people who work for the CAJ ...geddit) - it now &#039;receives&#039; monies too for Human Rights Consortium ...which I doubt knows its CAJ history. In its Annual Report CAJ does not mention the Human Rights Trust side to its &#039;business&#039;. Would be interesting to know who are the Directors of the Human Rights ...could be people we know. When the Charities Commission gets going people will have a way of finding out.
 
But a more important point is - why on earth did the NIHRC buy into this money mess - making it vulnerable to accusations of lack of independance? But then why is NIHRC embriolled in discussions with NIO regarding the request by  its 10 Commissioners to have pension rights (as well as £10,000), given that many give service to quangos for no money at all?.  

Seems to me that with money, comes vulnerability. Will they never learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, it is regretable that Martin O&#8217;Brien chose the memorial to Stephen Livingstone to produce the views outlined above &#8211; Stephen was a person to be admired.<br />
Secondly, I am surprised that noone has mentioned so far that well known fact that AA system of funding is such that noone can apply to them! No, they believe that their staff are so talented (and so objective presumably) that they identify what is important to fund (I rest my case).</p>
<p>Thirdly re the Human Rights Trust which receives so much from AA &#8211; my understanding is that it was set up by &#8211; Martin O&#8217;Brien when he was Director of CAJ so that CAJ would be secure (hence pensions for people who work for the CAJ &#8230;geddit) &#8211; it now &#8216;receives&#8217; monies too for Human Rights Consortium &#8230;which I doubt knows its CAJ history. In its Annual Report CAJ does not mention the Human Rights Trust side to its &#8216;business&#8217;. Would be interesting to know who are the Directors of the Human Rights &#8230;could be people we know. When the Charities Commission gets going people will have a way of finding out.</p>
<p>But a more important point is &#8211; why on earth did the NIHRC buy into this money mess &#8211; making it vulnerable to accusations of lack of independance? But then why is NIHRC embriolled in discussions with NIO regarding the request by  its 10 Commissioners to have pension rights (as well as £10,000), given that many give service to quangos for no money at all?.  </p>
<p>Seems to me that with money, comes vulnerability. Will they never learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363698</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363698</guid>
		<description>Realised that my previous link only linked to the first blog, so here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/entries.asp?bid=25&amp;tag=Stephen Livingstone&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the whole Stephen Livingstone lecture series of blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realised that my previous link only linked to the first blog, so here&#8217;s a <a href="http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/entries.asp?bid=25&#038;tag=Stephen Livingstone" target="_blank">link</a> to the whole Stephen Livingstone lecture series of blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FairPlayForAllPlease</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363692</link>
		<dc:creator>FairPlayForAllPlease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363692</guid>
		<description>Rapunsel, in my university days I was a member of Amnesty International and what attracted me to their Prisoners of Conscience programme was that the POCs had to be people who didn&#039;t use violence to achieve their political objectives, unlike the IRA or their equally bloody Prod equivalents. CAJ and AP are far far more interested in perpetrators&#039; rights, and, especially in CAJ&#039;s case, never took up the &quot;rights&quot; of victims with any enthusiasm. Anti-state, always. And the state&#039;s first responsibility is to safeguard the rights of its citizens. We are now in a position in NI where that should be the case. And the social contract between citizen and governed involves RESPONSIBILITIES of the citizen too. Why do we never hear about that ? Some of us never voted Unionist in our lives but you would brand us anti-rights because we are critical of a FOREIGN funder coming in here to put millions of pounds into politically correct agendas which could not be fulfilled out of NI budgets ? And that&#039;s OK ?
That&#039;s fair ? That&#039;s equitable ? We ELECT people to make our decisions, however bad or good, we elect them. NOBODY elected Chuck Feeney and he is not a citizen of Ireland or the UK. He&#039;s a Yank. It&#039;s called foreign imperialism or US capitalist imperialism. But that&#039;s OK, is it ? And is it OK for Sinn Fein to be the wealthiest party on this island because it can raise millions in the US from gullible Irish-Americans ? Can the SDLP do that ? Alliance ? The UUs ? Hardly. Is that a level playing field ?
Raise the money you want for your political purposes in NI and then you won&#039;t be open to charges of playing local politics with foreign filthy lucre, with getting your own way by getting your money to do your work from outsiders. Let&#039;s keep it fair, right ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapunsel, in my university days I was a member of Amnesty International and what attracted me to their Prisoners of Conscience programme was that the POCs had to be people who didn&#8217;t use violence to achieve their political objectives, unlike the IRA or their equally bloody Prod equivalents. CAJ and AP are far far more interested in perpetrators&#8217; rights, and, especially in CAJ&#8217;s case, never took up the &#8220;rights&#8221; of victims with any enthusiasm. Anti-state, always. And the state&#8217;s first responsibility is to safeguard the rights of its citizens. We are now in a position in NI where that should be the case. And the social contract between citizen and governed involves RESPONSIBILITIES of the citizen too. Why do we never hear about that ? Some of us never voted Unionist in our lives but you would brand us anti-rights because we are critical of a FOREIGN funder coming in here to put millions of pounds into politically correct agendas which could not be fulfilled out of NI budgets ? And that&#8217;s OK ?<br />
That&#8217;s fair ? That&#8217;s equitable ? We ELECT people to make our decisions, however bad or good, we elect them. NOBODY elected Chuck Feeney and he is not a citizen of Ireland or the UK. He&#8217;s a Yank. It&#8217;s called foreign imperialism or US capitalist imperialism. But that&#8217;s OK, is it ? And is it OK for Sinn Fein to be the wealthiest party on this island because it can raise millions in the US from gullible Irish-Americans ? Can the SDLP do that ? Alliance ? The UUs ? Hardly. Is that a level playing field ?<br />
Raise the money you want for your political purposes in NI and then you won&#8217;t be open to charges of playing local politics with foreign filthy lucre, with getting your own way by getting your money to do your work from outsiders. Let&#8217;s keep it fair, right ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363681</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363681</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/blogs_entry.asp?eid=4579&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; to start of Corrigan&#039;s blog series on Martin O&#039;Brien&#039;s lecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/blogs_entry.asp?eid=4579" target="_blank">Link</a> to start of Corrigan&#8217;s blog series on Martin O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s lecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363679</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363679</guid>
		<description>Slugger / Turgon: do keep up. This speech (from October!) was blogged in detail weeks ago, section by section, by Patrick Corrigan over at Amnesty Blogs: Belfast and Beyond. Well worth a full read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slugger / Turgon: do keep up. This speech (from October!) was blogged in detail weeks ago, section by section, by Patrick Corrigan over at Amnesty Blogs: Belfast and Beyond. Well worth a full read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejusdem generis</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363678</link>
		<dc:creator>ejusdem generis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363678</guid>
		<description>Fact check:
The PILS Project anticipates that lawyers will undertake work on a pro bono basis. 

Small minded and ill informed petty jealousy is alive and well on Slugger I see. Equality and Human Rights &#039;industry&#039;? This is a familiar insult refrain from the &#039;political industry&#039;, which is every bit as reliant on the public purse for its dysfunctional, querulous, navel-gazing nonsense - a public purse to which lawyers contribute plenty in tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact check:<br />
The PILS Project anticipates that lawyers will undertake work on a pro bono basis. </p>
<p>Small minded and ill informed petty jealousy is alive and well on Slugger I see. Equality and Human Rights &#8216;industry&#8217;? This is a familiar insult refrain from the &#8216;political industry&#8217;, which is every bit as reliant on the public purse for its dysfunctional, querulous, navel-gazing nonsense &#8211; a public purse to which lawyers contribute plenty in tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igor</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363677</link>
		<dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363677</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Community Restorative Justice. Where is it now? 

Wasn&#039;t that the one where &#039;local people&#039; went around to have a chat with young people involved in &#039;anti-social behaviour&#039; &#123;like not doing what the Shinners told them or annoying &#039;the community&#039;&#125; and tried to &#039;mediate&#039; the problems after blowing their kneecaps off became unfashionable. 

It still seems to exists and if you google it and look at Street View, it looks a very high class operation for the £1.35m

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?layer=c&amp;cbll=54.554082,-6.024410&amp;cbp=12,,,1,&amp;ved=0CBAQ2wU&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=r_YWS_T0OJS9jAflmY35DA

They obviously spend all the money on the volunteers, not the offices

I assume it is all done in the nicest possible taste and fully respecting the human rights of the poor victims and the young people who may have strayed from the true path. 

Anyway, has CRJ produced a report on it? 

On on the exiling of people from NI? 

The disappeared perhaps?

The environmental and health damage caused by laundering diesel in South Armagh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Community Restorative Justice. Where is it now? </p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t that the one where &#8216;local people&#8217; went around to have a chat with young people involved in &#8216;anti-social behaviour&#8217; &#123;like not doing what the Shinners told them or annoying &#8216;the community&#8217;&#125; and tried to &#8216;mediate&#8217; the problems after blowing their kneecaps off became unfashionable. </p>
<p>It still seems to exists and if you google it and look at Street View, it looks a very high class operation for the £1.35m</p>
<p><a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?layer=c&#038;cbll=54.554082,-6.024410&#038;cbp=12" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?layer=c&#038;cbll=54.554082,-6.024410&#038;cbp=12</a>,,,1,&#038;ved=0CBAQ2wU&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=r_YWS_T0OJS9jAflmY35DA</p>
<p>They obviously spend all the money on the volunteers, not the offices</p>
<p>I assume it is all done in the nicest possible taste and fully respecting the human rights of the poor victims and the young people who may have strayed from the true path. </p>
<p>Anyway, has CRJ produced a report on it? </p>
<p>On on the exiling of people from NI? </p>
<p>The disappeared perhaps?</p>
<p>The environmental and health damage caused by laundering diesel in South Armagh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapunsel</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363671</link>
		<dc:creator>rapunsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363671</guid>
		<description>Well  what a nice wee circle of people feeding of each others prejudices. sure we don&#039;t want any uppity fenian lawyers ( or any ethnic sorts) trying to and succeeding in challenging breaches of rights.

I have no great knowledge but is Atlantic Philanthropies not a private  organisation. id say they can do whatever they want with their money? At least they&#039;re getting up the noses  of the small minded posters hers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well  what a nice wee circle of people feeding of each others prejudices. sure we don&#8217;t want any uppity fenian lawyers ( or any ethnic sorts) trying to and succeeding in challenging breaches of rights.</p>
<p>I have no great knowledge but is Atlantic Philanthropies not a private  organisation. id say they can do whatever they want with their money? At least they&#8217;re getting up the noses  of the small minded posters hers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FairPlayForAllPlease</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363670</link>
		<dc:creator>FairPlayForAllPlease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363670</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, this claim by Martin O&#039;Brien that a majority of people in NI &quot;support&quot; a NI Bill of Rights wouldn&#039;t just happen to from a &quot;poll&quot; done for the NIHRC and/or its lobbying arm for the B of R, paid for by O&#039;Brien&#039;s Atlantic Philanthropies ? 
And A P of course has given Monica McWilliams&#039;s NIHRC at least 200,000 quid to date and with, what is it, 1.3-million quid more now being sought for Monica&#039;s wish-list of projects close to her heart ? 
But how &quot;independent&quot; is NIHRC OR A P when A P&#039;s billionaire creator, Chuck Feeney, happily forked out hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund Sinn Fein&#039;s offices in the USA? Chuck clearly loves S F. Has he funded the SDLP ? The Alliance Party ? The UUs...sorry, stupid to have asked the latter question.
Hmmmm.....not very &quot;equal,&quot; bit of a double standard in operation here. O&#039;Brien heads CAJ, then gets the top NI job at....A P. How nice for him.
So NIHRC doesn&#039;t plan to fund its major activities from here on forth from its own 1.7-million quid budget? No, it has a FOREIGN organisation fund its activities! So much for an even-playing-field and &quot;independence.&quot; It gets a lot of money or wants a lot of money from SF-friendly Chuck Feeney&#039;s A P.
Time for full disclosure. CAJ, O&#039;Brien&#039;s former employer, got at least 1.767-million quid from A P. No conflict of interest there for Mr. O&#039;Brien or CAJ ?? No question of standing aside there ?
The list of grants under &quot;Human Rights Trust&quot; shows a staggering 3.492-million! British-Irish Rights Watch 949K. Community Restorative Justice 1.352-million quid! Plus another 1.110-million for CRJ work!
If anyone wants to see who gets Chuck Feeney&#039;s largesse, just go to A P&#039;s website and look under grantees and Northern Ireland and zero in on who gets what dough. All under Martin O&#039;Brien&#039;s aegis. Try: www.atlanticphilanthropies.org
Nice money, and a hell of a lot of it, as long as you&#039;re politically correct enough and pass a CAJ-type sniff test. Is there an agenda here ? I&#039;d say....Fairness across the board, balance, equal treatment ? No, heavily tilted in one direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, this claim by Martin O&#8217;Brien that a majority of people in NI &#8220;support&#8221; a NI Bill of Rights wouldn&#8217;t just happen to from a &#8220;poll&#8221; done for the NIHRC and/or its lobbying arm for the B of R, paid for by O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Atlantic Philanthropies ?<br />
And A P of course has given Monica McWilliams&#8217;s NIHRC at least 200,000 quid to date and with, what is it, 1.3-million quid more now being sought for Monica&#8217;s wish-list of projects close to her heart ?<br />
But how &#8220;independent&#8221; is NIHRC OR A P when A P&#8217;s billionaire creator, Chuck Feeney, happily forked out hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund Sinn Fein&#8217;s offices in the USA? Chuck clearly loves S F. Has he funded the SDLP ? The Alliance Party ? The UUs&#8230;sorry, stupid to have asked the latter question.<br />
Hmmmm&#8230;..not very &#8220;equal,&#8221; bit of a double standard in operation here. O&#8217;Brien heads CAJ, then gets the top NI job at&#8230;.A P. How nice for him.<br />
So NIHRC doesn&#8217;t plan to fund its major activities from here on forth from its own 1.7-million quid budget? No, it has a FOREIGN organisation fund its activities! So much for an even-playing-field and &#8220;independence.&#8221; It gets a lot of money or wants a lot of money from SF-friendly Chuck Feeney&#8217;s A P.<br />
Time for full disclosure. CAJ, O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s former employer, got at least 1.767-million quid from A P. No conflict of interest there for Mr. O&#8217;Brien or CAJ ?? No question of standing aside there ?<br />
The list of grants under &#8220;Human Rights Trust&#8221; shows a staggering 3.492-million! British-Irish Rights Watch 949K. Community Restorative Justice 1.352-million quid! Plus another 1.110-million for CRJ work!<br />
If anyone wants to see who gets Chuck Feeney&#8217;s largesse, just go to A P&#8217;s website and look under grantees and Northern Ireland and zero in on who gets what dough. All under Martin O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s aegis. Try: <a href="http://www.atlanticphilanthropies.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlanticphilanthropies.org</a><br />
Nice money, and a hell of a lot of it, as long as you&#8217;re politically correct enough and pass a CAJ-type sniff test. Is there an agenda here ? I&#8217;d say&#8230;.Fairness across the board, balance, equal treatment ? No, heavily tilted in one direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeCanuck</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363668</link>
		<dc:creator>joeCanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363668</guid>
		<description>Certainly, Andrew.
Catholics can walk down Garvaghy Road any time they want. Protestants can&#039;t (well, some of them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, Andrew.<br />
Catholics can walk down Garvaghy Road any time they want. Protestants can&#8217;t (well, some of them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew white</title>
		<link>http://sluggerotoole.com/2009/12/03/committee-on-the-administration-of-jusrtices-latest-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-363654</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew white</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-363654</guid>
		<description>so with all this talk of equality form McGuinness and CAJ can someone tell me which rights protestants/unionists have that nationalists/catholics dont. or which laws apply to one set and not the other??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so with all this talk of equality form McGuinness and CAJ can someone tell me which rights protestants/unionists have that nationalists/catholics dont. or which laws apply to one set and not the other??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 3/24 queries in 0.022 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 524/524 objects using memcached

Served from: sluggerotoole.com @ 2012-05-27 05:39:27 -->
