Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”

Thu 17 September 2009, 7:59pm

Nice bit of satire from the BBC NI political editor. In response to the tale told here and here.

One gang tossed a 43 page document entitled “Rights and Respect” over the peace wall. The other responded with a 75 page draft called “Building a Better Future”. “They may look harmless when you just open them up on your computer as a PDF file” the CRC DMSU officer explained “but put that in a ring binder and toss it over a 12 foot high wall and it can give you a very nasty cut”.

Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Delicious Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Digg Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Facebook Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Google+ Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on LinkedIn Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Pinterest Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on reddit Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on StumbleUpon Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Twitter Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Add to Bookmarks Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Email Share '“It’s getting ugly at the Stormont interface.”' on Print Friendly

Comments (7)

  1. DR says:

    Have just sorta read most of SFs “Rights and Respect” document, it is far from harmless, as I now suffer from a terrible headache. I’m almost give up after the first few pages of saying its all about rights and the ethnic minorities, no wonder the DUP never replied they still havnt a clue what its going on about.
    I havnt found their proposals on here yet btw hence cant comment on then, can someone point me to which of petes infinites links its on?
    And can someone try to strip the crap out of the SF one and tell me what they are proposing.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. maeglin says:

    You can link into the October draft docu by going to the DUP page (www.dup.org.uk) and opening the press statement “Sinn Fein failing to deliver a shared future”. I don’t know how to link this properly?!?

    BTW the dup are saying they replied with a series of meeting making it clear to SF that a document with its only premise being “equality is the foundation of good relations” was not going to be the basis of any agreement. The DUP are also saying they produced a document to SF in July outlining a possible way forward.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. slug says:

    It says on the front page of the draft document the DUP released: “IMPUT STILL REQUIRED”

    Is imput a word?

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. fin says:

    there is a verb impute, as in “To relate to a particular cause or source; attribute the fault or responsibility to”.

    The prefix “in” usually assimilates with a “p” sound to make “imp”, such as important (prefix “in” + Latin present participle portant), because it’s harder to say inportant, than important, people say imput because it’s easier to pronounce, because “P” is a plosive consonant– meaning you have put a stop to the air supply and then release the air, and depending on the shape of the lips, teeth, and mouth, you get a specific consonant. The transition from the “nnn” to the “puh” means that you have to stop the air and sound in the middle of the word by closing the lips. Because the “m” sound is just an “n” with closed lips, the mouth naturally wants to close down to make the “puh” come out faster and easier. Try it. It’s impossible (immmpossible) to say input without closing the lips; therefore, you say “m” in the middle of the word

    And all that has just translated into the written word. Although it shows the age of the DUPers as the term was popular in its written form in the late 70s’ 80s’ but is rarely seen now

    Simple answer. No

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. joeCanuck says:

    Hilarious. Could have come straight from the pages of “The Portadown News”.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  6. Paul McMahon says:

    Classic Fin

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  7. Maeglin says:

    ? It says input??

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
31 queries. 0.274 seconds.