Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

“a true blast from the past..”

Wed 29 April 2009, 2:16am

M33 ultraviolet and infrared[Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech]. I had mentioned just how really big space is. Left is an image of M33, one of our closest galactic neighbours at just 2.9 million light-years away, viewed in ultraviolet – to show recent star formation – by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, celebrating 6 years in operation, and in infrared by the Spitzer Space Telescope. Below is an image of one of our most distant relatives, also from Spitzer. With a red shift of 8.2, corresponding to a distance of around 13.035 billion light years, when the Universe was only 630 million years old, Gamma Ray Burst 090423 is the most distant cosmic explosion detected yet. [Second Image Credit: NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler.] Telescopes, eh? Just be thankful it wasn’t closer.. Oh, and Europe’s Herschel and Planck telescopes will be launched on 14 May.
Gamma Ray Burst 090423

Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Delicious Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Digg Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Facebook Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Google+ Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on LinkedIn Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Pinterest Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on reddit Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on StumbleUpon Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Twitter Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Add to Bookmarks Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Email Share '“a true blast from the past..”' on Print Friendly

Comments (6)

  1. SultanofSwing says:

    Just to confirm that I also am a big fan of these deep space images and I find them awe inspiring.

    Keep delivering.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. malachi says:

    how can we know that anything more than a few light years away is still there? These are pictures of the distant past surely

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. joeCanuck says:

    Malachi,
    You’re almost right. But it’s not a couple of light years. It’s anything beyond the distance that light can travel in the minimum human attention span. Light travels at around 186,000 miles per second.
    So when you look up at the sun and feel comforted that it’s still there, you could be mistaken; it may have blown apart up to about 5 minutes or so ago.
    Even the sunlight reflected from the moon takes about 1 1/4 seconds to reach earth.
    Incidentally, that’s also the reason why there’s a slight delay in a telephone conversation when the signal is relayed via a geosynchronous satellite.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. malachi says:

    them maybe we have a smaller universe than we suppose

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. greenflag says:

    malachi ,

    ‘maybe we have a smaller universe than we suppose’

    Northern Ireland is a very small ‘universe’. There are those who wish it was in a far off galaxy not too distant from a gamma ray burst ;)

    On the subject of large numbers . Once you pass the billion mark the human mind seems not up to the task of practically envisioning such vast distances .

    The same phenomenon is now alas also found when one tries to envision say the USA’s 3 trillion dollar ‘bail out ‘ or it’s 14 trillion dollar debt .

    To bring the latter down to a human scale . If you sat a table and started counting out ten dollar notes one at a time going back in history by the same amount of time it takes you to count each note then you would finally count out the last ten dollar bill about 300,000 years ago or at least 100,000 years before Homo Sapiens emerged as a species ;)

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  6. Ulsters my homeland says:

    Joe, if you think about the quatization of space into blocks of shapes (which you touched on in Peter’s other thread), the speed of light may vary from one block/unit to the another, ultimately changing the time for light to travel.

    If space can be quantized into blocks of space, views from hubble may be like viewing through a collideascope.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
30 queries. 0.230 seconds.