Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

Accountability?

Mon 1 December 2008, 11:37pm

The First and Deputy First Ministers have suggested that having to appear before the Assembly to answer questions is too much, and that once a month would be better (in contrast to every other First and Prime Minister in the UK). Although, during this assembly, the FM and DFM have been taking it time about, so they would, one assumes, now each answer questions only once every two months.

Share 'Accountability?' on Delicious Share 'Accountability?' on Digg Share 'Accountability?' on Facebook Share 'Accountability?' on Google+ Share 'Accountability?' on LinkedIn Share 'Accountability?' on Pinterest Share 'Accountability?' on reddit Share 'Accountability?' on StumbleUpon Share 'Accountability?' on Twitter Share 'Accountability?' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'Accountability?' on Email Share 'Accountability?' on Print Friendly

Comments (12)

  1. iluvni says:

    They should be there every week answering questions, never mind asking for a reduction.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. Nomad says:

    Who is really bothered about accountable democracy anyway? ..

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. Aerial Liquitab says:

    Nice to see Peter Robinson and his new best friend Martin McGuiness working hard for we the public.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. pith says:

    As an indicator of Robinson’s intellectuall inadequacy this beats them all. He was always good at the easy business of asking questions. Answering them is a bit more difficult as any good estate agent would admit. I still think he is at his most natural in photo number 42 of the Belfast Telegraph ‘Troubles archive’.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. pith says:

    The spelling mistake is sympathetic.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  6. slug says:

    I think Peter is very good at answering questions. I don’t know what is behind this.

    When Mrs T and John Major were PMs they went to PMQs twice a week. Tony Blair reduced it to once a week and that was consistent with the widespread view he had a low regard for Parliament

    Same for the FM and DFM? Do this indicate a contempt for the Assembly?

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  7. Hbf says:

    Does anybody know if there is more to their argument? Perhaps they feel that they are overworked? Maybe that’s why they want their junior ministers to take the questions for them.

    If they can’t justify their argument then the procedure committee should reject the preposal, and I don’t think that insisting that their department needs no more questions than any other is fair – I agree with mark Durkan on that.

    I think a less one-sided argument is the one about letting their junior ministers take questions for them. But we can’t really talk about that until we know exactly what the proposal is.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  8. Danny O'Connor says:

    OFMDFM have many responsibilities within their department ,the committee (I am not sure of the current status)because of this used to be the largest committee in the assembly.
    As joint chairmen of the executive they should have to account for this also – especially now.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  9. Pam says:

    If they are citing that fact that every other Minister answers questions every 4 weeks, then the argument doesn’t stack up. The Prime Minister answers questions each week and he doesn’t have a Department of his own to run.

    If its a case of diary organising and them wanting to free up time, then I’d be sympathetic to say them answering questions for an hour once a month rather than half an hour twice a month, if it frees their diaries a bit. They could even share a QT with a junior Minister and get them to answer questions on their areas, in the same way as at NI questions, Goggins will answer security questions etc.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  10. William says:

    Pam….it’s nothing to do with ‘freeing up time’, ‘arranging diaries’; it is all to do with McGuinness and Robinson having a contempt for the Assembly and not wishing to be questioned in the House. With two Ministers, it would mean that Robbo and the 2 I/c would actually only appear once every two months, as they alternate their appearances at present.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  11. fair_deal says:

    Don’t see the sense of this proposal at all.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  12. spadesaspade says:

    No one should hold their breath waiting for mc guiness to supply answers.
    Republicans have been asking questions for years as to what really went on with out success.
    Send marti a hearing aid for xmas.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
52 queries. 0.275 seconds.