“God got to Adams and it was checkmate.”

God’s nutting squad got to others. Do we have any agreement on who whacked Sands’ mate, Denis Decommisioner Donaldson? So many men,so few bullets.

As I always say, if God existed, it would be necessary to abolish him/her!

“Being filled with love” — I like beer as well.

Throughout this whole so-called controversy, no one has questioned Lawrence McKeown’s integrity – as it is unlikely that any republican would, no matter what they may think of Gerry Adams and the Republican leadership – and here you are calling him a liar and moreover stating that he is lying to protect himself, but I’m not surprised; history is full of examples of people clutching at straws to make failed arguments.

Has the Adams leadership ever told the truth about anything?

He certainly didn’t reveal this episode in his memoirs:-

Gerry Adams’ secret fear or the origins of the peace process revealed

I was a student at university in Galway this time twenty-two years ago when I had the most amazing spiritual experience that any human being could have. While writing an essay as an entry to the UCG Philosophical Society’s competition, I felt the most amazing sense of peace descend on me. I felt an absolute sense of love for all people and an overwhelming sense that I was loved too. I was filled with love.

My essay concerned two babies, whose nametags were switched at birth, and who grew up in families that opposed each other, one a republican and the other a loyalist. These two children ended up murdering their natural fathers in violent incidents during the Troubles. The moral of the story was straightforward, I felt, and in a philosophical sense it meant that all violence was futile and that sectarian violence was simply patricide – or a desire to simply end the human race.

But the feeling of love would not go away after I wrote the essay. I felt that I was in the midst of something really profound and my mind began to search for what that overwhelming significant matter could be. Then it struck me.

It was like lightning struck me. It was to do with the other part of a calculation a friend had shown me in my days at St Columb’s College as a fifteen year old. That calculation worked out the name of Ian Paisley at 666. I had checked the references in the Book of Revelation at that time and I knew that there were to be two beasts.

“Gerry Adams! It has to be!” I roared to myself in the kitchen of the small flat where I had my experience of great love and peace.

I set down the same numeric alphabet, and calculated Gerry Adams’ name at 666. It was the icing on the cake. I now had an equation to back my essay up. My thesis, which in large part was the SDLP thesis, was being validated by God.

I never had any doubt that the SDLP thesis was Christian in orientation, or that the republican campaign of violence was evil in orientation. But now I had the proof. I tried it out on a few people, mainly Sinn Fein members at UCG and they were very interested (and worried). It seemed that I had something on them.

But it only impacted on them. It never impacted on others because others didn’t consider themselves to be doing anything wrong, as opposed to the Sinn Fein members who were assisting the IRA in their campaign of violence. I was left in no doubt that my discovery had gone straight to Gerry Adams.

It wasn’t long before I heard from Sinn Fein. Others may make up excuses but I know that the attack on our home, smashing several windows, in August 1986 was a warning from Sinn Fein. But it was too late. Their war was over. I had taken out their king and all good chess players will know that that is the game over.

Within months of that time, Gerry Adams was sending signals through Fr Alec Reid that he was prepared to end the IRA campaign. My experience had sown the seeds of doubt in Adams’ mind and unnerved him completely. He didn’t want to be the Antichrist. More accurately, he didn’t want to go down in history as the man who was regarded as the Antichrist.

In Spring 1987, a year after my experience, the peace process began in earnest with talks between John Hume and Gerry Adams arranged through Fr Alec Reid, and so the history books record a rational explanation of the ending of the IRA campaign.

No-one – especially not republicans – really wants to contemplate the possibility that something got to Gerry Adams to make him decide finally, after months of dithering, to give up the violence.

That something was God. Gerry Adams was confronted with what he had become by God – through me, his instrument – in 1986 and he very quickly developed a yellow streak. They say that Gerry Adams was never all that hot about the war and that has led to all kinds of speculation that he was a top level agent of the British and so on.

But I can end that speculation. Gerry Adams finally came to the conclusion that the war had to end when he realised that history will record him alongside Ian Paisley as the one of the two beasts of Revelation.

God had hit the Republican Movement at its weak point. It was thought that Sinn Fein was impenetrable because of its egalitarian structure which meant that Adams could have been replaced if got to. But the republicans had made a big mistake. They had relied heavily on Adams to fight their case in the public domain so he came to matter more than all the others. God got to Adams and it was checkmate.

If we’re to take these quotes at their word, We must be prepared to believe that Lawrence McKeown – a highly intelligent man who spent 5 years on the blanket and 70 days on hunger strike and only survived it because his parents took him off of it while he was in a coma – is protecting a leadership, which includes Gerry Adams, that was allegedly willing to allow him and others to die so that they could secure electoral advantage at a time when support within the Republican Movement for electoral politics was limited and by no means settled.

I’m sorry but that is more of a stretch than I am prepared to make.

As you will probably understand, neither Gerry nor Collette would be all that important in the grand scheme of things. Gerry may be the Antichrist but that doesn’t make him important. It just makes him bad. Who is Berie?

But you’re wrong about one thing: God hates the English establishment, not the Irish.(From your link to website).

But I can categorically deny that Mrs Adams is the whore of Bablyon. See Below:-

Queen Elizabeth II

The woman sitting on the beast in the Book of Revelation (Rev 17:3) is the most vivid image of evil womanhood in the Bible. She is said to be the Whore of Babylon, a prostitute of prostitutes.

But who is she?

The Whore of Babylon is just that, the female ruler of Babylon. The evil empire, Babylon, has an even more potent ability to do evil than the Antichrist. That is the way it must be. Babylon is mirrored on the Roman Empire, and the Whore could well be a man or a woman.

But the gender chosen by the author of the Book of Revelation is the female one. That is the prophecy and thus we should be guided by it. The Whore is a woman. Moreover, when the prophecies are fulfilled, the Whore is to be a woman. The central coincidence therefore is that the ruler of Babylon is a woman and not a man.

As we are living through the age of the fulfilment of the prophecies of the Book of Revelation, we are bound by logic to seek a woman who is typical of the kind of woman who the Bible would define as a prostitute.

But she must be a woman. She must be there both to guide women away from her and serve as a warning to men.

There is only one woman who serves this joint purpose in our sphere here in Northern Ireland. Within the context of the English-speaking world being the power that is known in the Book of Revelation as Babylon, only the British Queen can be seen as the Whore of Babylon.

She is the Head of State of the British nation, and of the Commonwealth of Nations, the former colonies of the British Empire. She exerts influence far and wide on many men and women who look up to her in all her splendour.

‘That is the way,’ they say, as they look at the Queen of England with all her wealth and money, and castles and estates, palaces and servants.

But Jesus is ‘the way, the truth and the life’. The two ways are in competition. The British Queen serves the god of money in her escape from reality. Jesus serves the natural way of the strong human being in his modest life and the absence of possessions. Jesus serves God.

Everything taught to children about Christ and the Christian way is destroyed by those who honour the British Queen. She is the epitome of emptiness and thoughtlessness as she lives in the privileged world surrounded by material possessions and money.

In her heart she boasts,
‘I sit as Queen;
I am not a widow,
And I will never mourn.’ (Rev 18:7)

The pertinent coincidences here are that she is a queen, and that she is not a widow. She is devoid of emotion, so she will never mourn, another coincidence, as she embraces the world she inherited, a desert in the middle of a famine of human love and goodness.

Most importantly of all, the British Queen has no soul. She is empty. Her spirit is dead. She is death warmed up. Examining her speech, one has to conclude that she speaks without love. She has nothing in her heart.

Still Gerry Adams is a big boy and in his day he has often played dirty, fast and loose and once he put his head in the English tigers mouth, he can hardly complain if he gets it bitten off, for such is a political life.

I sense that Gerry Adams is going soon too. Others are getting that feeling, but the mainstream media are ignoring it. My belief is based on the fulfilment of a prophecy about the beast (Adams) and the false prophet (Paisley) whose names come at 666. I copy it below.

What will herald end of Adams and Paisley ?

In reply, John O’Connell said, “I think that the prophecies point to an unpleasant good-bye gift from Adams and Paisley. That may mean some violence. This comes from the verse, “he [i.e. the Antichrist] once was, now is not, and yet will come” (Rev 17:8). The Antichrist who “once was, now is not” is a reference to the fact that Adams was acting once as the Antichrist (i.e. during the Troubles) and “now” is no longer acting in that way. “Yet will come” indicates that before the prophecies will end, he will return to being the Antichrist. This was always going to happen as no-one insisted on Adams repenting of his past. But the question is, when will the prophecies end?”

John’s answer to that question was detailed. “Interpreting the next verses gives a timescale for the fulfilment of the prophecies. “The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. They are also seven kings,” (Rev 17:9). The seven hills symbolise Rome, built on seven hills, so the author of Revelation is attacking the Roman Empire. The comparable empire in our context and era is the British Empire and the city comparable to Rome is London. So the seven kings come from London.

“Those kings are described as “Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come” (Rev 17:10). Coincidentally during the Troubles, the Troubles being the key timeframe, five London PMs have fallen: Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, and Major. “One is,” or the sixth PM, must refer to Tony Blair under whom much of the changes to the North took place. The other who has not yet come is remarked: “…but when he does come he must remain for a little while” (Rev 17:10). I think that this must refer to Gordon Brown who won’t be PM for long by this account.

“The fact that Blair is referred to as “one is” demonstrates that the major prophecies occur under his rule while he “is”, and also while the Antichrist “is not” (see above), which happens at the same time, i.e. at present. But the whole sequence of verses, ante-ceded with the proviso, “This calls for a mind with wisdom,” (Rev 17: 9), making them the most mysterious verses in the Book of Revelation, also signals that the whole framework will have outworked itself by the time of the seventh king, “who has not yet come, but when he does come he must remain for a little while”.

So when Gordon Brown, the seventh king elect, stops being PM, which won’t be long according to the prophecies, Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams will be disgraced and in turmoil, or “thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulphur” (Rev 19:20). The intriguing question is what happens under Gordon Brown that leads to this outcome.”

See my website -click on my name.

The problem is not that the leadership read the situation wrong, as there is no shame in that, but that years later they attempted to cover this up by smearing Richard O’Rawe, who is an honorable man. However that this matter has once again raised its ugly head at this time, is undoubtedly because there seems to be a campaign to edge Gerry Adams out. Who and what lays behind this only those involved know for sure.

Still Gerry Adams is a big boy and in his day he has often played dirty, fast and loose and once he put his head in the English tigers mouth, he can hardly complain if he gets it bitten off, for such is a political life.

So who is actually surprised by this? We have to remember these are murdering scumbags we’re talking about here, they’re not like the rest of us, they should all be put in jail until they rot.