Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

Ministerial mind to turn?

Mon 28 January 2008, 10:37pm

An interesting, and short, snippet from the end of Stormont Live today. According to the BBC’s political editor Mark Devenport “all the buzz”, as the Assembly’s Environment Committee waits on Section 44 being imposed by the Speaker, is that the Environment minister, the DUP’s Arlene Foster, will use a ministerial statement tomorrow to “row back” on her previous position of being “of a mind to approve” Seymour Sweeney’s private development of the Causeway Visitor’s Centre and instead approve a publicly funded project [Or "be of a mind to approve".. - Ed]. We’ll find out tomorrow whether it’s claimed that was the intention all along.. but such a u-turn could, as the previous statement did, have implications for the Tourism minister.. let’s hope they’ve budgeted for that eventuality.. and any other alternative views..

Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Delicious Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Digg Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Facebook Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Google+ Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on LinkedIn Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Pinterest Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on reddit Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on StumbleUpon Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Twitter Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Email Share 'Ministerial mind to turn?' on Print Friendly

Comments (3)

  1. Nevin says:

    PB, I mentioned this on the “a duty to ‘assert, protect and keep open’ public rights of way..” thread. AFAIK there is no alternative plan on the table as yet. Perhaps she’ll be ask for one but you might then ask if officials are facilitating or hindering the National Trust plan. Dodds had previously withheld financial support from the DETI sponsored public initiative.

    It might also be worth reminding readers of the Ministerial Code, in particular, that section which indicates that a project involving two ministries goes through the executive – something that AFAIK Foster and Dodds ignored.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. Butterknife says:

    As i wrote for a local Paper: -

    The party that sought power ought to accept its responsibility and act as fiduciaries. The Sweeny Affair does not bode well for the DUP Junior Minister of the OFMDFM as it would amount to dismissal elsewhere, nor does it look good as the burden of apparent bias is placed on his ministerial colleague’s ‘minded’ decision as an inference of constructive knowledge could be construed between DUP MLAs. This may not be the UUP’s proudest moment but indirectly we have much to be proud about and while the DUP Minister can carve up the budget pie to serve their own political ends the UUP will still exist to represent those who want an alternative to deep Orange and Green politics.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. Debbie says:

    Nice one Davenport for coming up with the goods on this one.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
21 queries. 0.223 seconds.