Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

It’s for your own good..

Mon 8 January 2007, 10:09pm

If the reports accurately reflect the judge’s decision it’s an interesting shift in emphasis. Ihab Shoukri’s third bail application on charges of “membership of the the UDA and UFF and professing to belonging to those organisations” has been denied. Previously, in July, Belfast High Court Lord Justice Nicholson had said that “he was concerned that if Shoukri was granted bail he would be a danger to the community and there would be public disorder” when denying the application. This time, seemingly, the reason given was that Shoukri could be killed if he was released. So, we’ll have to wait to see the strength, or lack, of the case presented by the PPS.. not that there’s a pattern at all.. UpdatedA little more information from this brief report

A previous bail hearing was told that UDA leaders had discussed murdering Shoukri before deciding to expel him and yesterday’s court heard that police had advised him of two death threats.

“Given those threats to him and the consequent risk to the public we feel very strongly that he should be kept in custody,” said the lawyer.

There are a few other individuals to whom that criteria could also be applied, you know…

Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Delicious Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Digg Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Facebook Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Google+ Share 'It’s for your own good..' on LinkedIn Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Pinterest Share 'It’s for your own good..' on reddit Share 'It’s for your own good..' on StumbleUpon Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Twitter Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Email Share 'It’s for your own good..' on Print Friendly

Comments (5)

  1. parcifal black spot says:

    Does the “Night boat to Cairo” still run from Belfast?

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. mickybrady says:

    no. but they re not checking veiled women at george best airport travelling to cairo,lol

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. Nationalist says:

    So if the UDA issue a couple of death threats then the British legal system will withhold a mans liberty just in case someone gets caught in the cross fire?

    Why is Johnny Adair allowed to walk the streets, are the Scots not as important as the Egyptian people in the Westland Road?

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. Pete Baker (profile) says:

    Nat

    As I said, there are a few other individuals to whom that criteria could also be applied..

    And not all of them would be within loyalism.. nor under threat from loyalists – or by the ‘good UDA’.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. Crataegus says:

    There is no doubt that it is the interests of all that this man remains where he is. Both judges are right, if out he would probably indulge in his previous life style and by so doing bring retribution upon himself. Of course if there hadn’t been the whole political manoeuvring around the UDA he probably would have seen the inside of a prison a lot sooner and many would have been spared his social skills.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
26 queries. 0.215 seconds.