Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

Beyond the deadline?

Fri 28 April 2006, 6:50pm

I don’t think that he’s one of the optimists Henry McDonald referred to, but in the Belfast Telegraph Brian Walker produces an intriguing twist to the November 24th deadline. According to his report, “although this interim Assembly can be wound up on November 24, the Assembly suspended on October 2003 remains technically in being.” Which could leave open the possibilty of another chapter even if the book is officially closed…Briajn Walker notes that Peter Hain declined to pass on any actual powers to the interim Assembly or to change the deadline itself, arguing that it’s an attempt to leave the MLAs with only one decision to make. But he also suggests that the loop-hole exists for the earlier Assembly to return -

Mr Hain had already turned down giving the Assembly veto powers over his reforms on the grounds “it would confuse accountability to Westminster”.

The real reason, though, is to deny MLAs any outlet of achievement short of making a deal. Another plain fact is that although this interim Assembly can be wound up on November 24, the Assembly suspended on October 2003 remains technically in being.

Whatever ministers may say, this week’s tortuous Commons manoeuvres show that ways can always be found to revive it.

All very confusing, which is why Sylvia Hermon wanted the Assembly of May 15 to be called a “forum”. But like everybody else, she was turned down.

Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Delicious Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Digg Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Facebook Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Google+ Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on LinkedIn Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Pinterest Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on reddit Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on StumbleUpon Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Twitter Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Email Share 'Beyond the deadline?' on Print Friendly

Comments (1)

  1. Rubicon says:

    Is Brian Walker suggesting that some opportunity for restoration of the ’98 Assembly exists after the November 24th deadline?

    From my reading of the Bill, the forum-Assembly ceases on November 25th and the 1998 Assembly will cease to exist no later than May 2007 or earlier by order of the Secretary of State.

    Technically, I suppose that could give a few extra months of existence during which a settlement could be reached. Who knows, given that deadlines are rarely met we may be facing such a situation. It’s an interesting gap that I can only assume is allowing for the likely risk that last minute negotiations may stretch beyong midnight on the 24th.

    But – after paying off the party political employees I can’t see the SoS delaying a termination order for very long.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
12 queries. 1.236 seconds.