Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

Major cash boost for [some] education

Thu 23 March 2006, 6:52pm

There was some additional funding for Northern Ireland announced via yesterday’s budget, some £26million, but the Secretary of State steered it carefully away [invested it on our behalf - Ed] into his previously announced 2-year Children and Young People’s Fund – making it now a £87million fund, with an additional £14.6million available to community and voluntary groups. Just as well there’s no pressure on other education services then.. I mean it’s not as if two Education and Library Boards are refusing to implement cuts in their budgets of £6.6million and £4.3million. Those cuts are in response to repeated over-spends in previous years, but it’s difficult to see the logic in pressing ahead with cuts while diverting more cash into a one-off untested scheme. Update Despite the earlier report, still online, The South Eastern Education and Library Board has agreed to a budget including £4.3million in cuts – “The vote was split between councillors – who voted to reject the budget – and non-elected representatives”

Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Delicious Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Digg Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Facebook Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Google+ Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on LinkedIn Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Pinterest Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on reddit Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on StumbleUpon Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Twitter Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Email Share 'Major cash boost for [some] education' on Print Friendly

Comments (3)

  1. Fipp says:

    It’s not an untested scheme – The £14.6 million is for projects that have been running for a couple of years and have a proven track record.

    Unfortunately the projects in question were orginally told no more funding would be available so many are in the process of winding down or have already closed and laid off staff. Obviously this will limit the impact that the money will have – or even how much of it can be spent. Well done NIO!

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. Pete Baker (profile) says:

    Fipp

    Granted the £14.6million is for existing projects, which as you say, has its own problems… that just leaves the other £87million..

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. IJP says:

    I’m not sure I agree, Pete, although I’m open to persuasion.

    The Boards have overspent in the past. So it appears to me that that is a tested scheme – and the test has failed!

    I’d prefer the money go straight to the schools. Even something as comparatively straightforward as electricity rises mean that schools are struggling to do the basics such as heating within budget (which doesn’t take account of such hikes) – with pressures to cut back on staff as a result.

    I’m fed up with ‘Boards’ pulling off consistent overspends with no apparent outcome. I want to see teachers maintained and paid a fair salary, quality classroom assistants, and money spent directly on pupils and the resources they need.

    What do you think?
    Judge it
    (Log in or register to mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
18 queries. 0.288 seconds.